Yesterday’s fish wrapper?

Yesterday’s fish wrapper?

 

 

Blog posts live on, as does anything posted to the net.

Sometimes they come back to bite us, sometimes they merge from a long hibernation to live again.

Last thing you want is for that Facebook photo from that wild party at university to emerge a decade later when interviewing for that ‘ideal job’.

On the other hand, a simple idea in hibernation for a decade can suddenly wake up and add new value. For someone, its time has come!

It happened yesterday.

A simple blog post from 14 years ago that has hibernated without being disturbed for most of those 14 years woke up yesterday, and went ‘ballistic’.

(Ballistic is a relative term, but in the context of the billions of posts out there, and the usual readership numbers of StrategyAudit, it was ballistic)

Whoever you are that stumbled across this old post, and obviously shared it to your networks, thanks, and I hope you are able to leverage the idea to your great benefit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 hurdles to successful ‘digitisation’

4 hurdles to successful ‘digitisation’

Often, I hear the term ‘Digital Strategy’ used as if it were an end result, some discrete set of activities to be completed.

To my mind, this is a misuse of the term.

As it is usually used, ‘Digital’ is all about the devices, the technology, whereas the value in digital is elsewhere. It is in the ability to get things done, differently, more quickly, efficiently, and in a distributed manner by those best able to complete the activity with the minimum of organisational friction.

It is about the business models enabled, the understanding of customers, ability to visualise the unseen, and communicate it clearly. It is not about the RFID tags, VR, and all the other enablers of digital, it is the outcomes that count.

Your strategy may be enabled by digital, but you do not need a digital strategy any more than you need a telephone strategy. They are both just tools to be leveraged.

Management of these changes is confronting, there is not a lot of precedent to go by. This is particularly the case now following the explosion of AI onto the scene. There is a lot of advice around, often delivered by those with a stake in selling you another product or service. However, it seems to me that there are a few simple parameters worth considering.

Functional Silo thinking is poison. The communication enabled by digital is inherently cross functional, better reflecting the way customers and suppliers see us and want to interact. Functional silos have little to do with optimised outcomes anymore. They have outlived their purpose and value.

One step at a time. While the pace of change is getting faster, and the pressure to keep up increasing, we all know what happens when we try and run down a hill really fast, we end up arse over tit. Matching the speed of change to the pace that your enterprise can absorb the change is pretty sensible. Of course, if you are the slowest in the competing pack, it may be better to get out while you can.

Digital is a team game. Hand balling digital responsibility to the IT people is a mistake. You will end up getting what they think you need, which is rarely what you really need. The real challenge is engagement of people not really focussed on digital. The primary example is in the space of marketing automation. Suddenly it exploded, way beyond the capabilities and experience of most marketing people, who are nevertheless now investing more in tech than the IT people. It is essential that the right capabilities are built in the right places. Finally, everyone affected, which is everyone, needs to be in on the secret, with all the options, challenges, and opportunities transparent. The unknown is the father of all sorts of ugly children.

Think long term. Digital transformations are not just about which software you will install to automate a process. Is more about what the business may look like in 5, 10 years, and what steps do you need to take over that time to reman relevant. Technology, much of which may not yet be available, will play a vital role in that evolution, but they remain tools of the evolution, rather than the main game.

Header credit: My thanks to Tom Gauld in New Scientist.

Trust: Is it the antidote to AI fakery?

Trust: Is it the antidote to AI fakery?

 

 

AI can put words in the mouth of any public figure and make it virtually indistinguishable from the real thing. It can create pictures that even experts cannot pick as digital facsimiles.

How can we trust anything we see or hear?

To date we have been able to pick the fakes by a range of tiny details. Spelling mistakes, poor grammar, or inconsistent details in a ‘photo’, but those days are now gone.

What will they be replaced by?

Trust?

How do you build trust on a base of quicksand?

Slowly. Carefully. Piece by piece. Showing up routinely and being consistent in the messaging by whatever means those messages are delivered. Always being both totally transparent and sometimes painfully honest, and always humble.

Beware, the blaring trumpet of confirmation bias will be blasting our senses from here on. Somehow, we must build an immunity and antidote, or we will be lost as a cohesive community.

The header of this post is the AI generated ‘photo’ by Boris Eldagsen that won the creative category at the Sony World Photography Awards in 2023.

While it was ‘early days’ in the public life of AI, the fact that experts failed to pick the ‘fake’ is disturbing. How are so called average people expected to be able to pick between the real speeches, transcripts, and photos of public figures when the experts make massive blues like this?

The experts disagree. Who knew?

AGI, or ‘Artificial General Intelligence’ is the point at which the magic of circuits has the ability to learn and respond to something for which it has not been taught. In short, it can think. It is a field of science that is being funded in the billions, weekly, and is a huge step forward from where we are now, with what is becoming ‘normal’ AI.

AGI pundits think AGI by 2030 is not just achievable, but a lay down misère, while the other camp think ‘probably never’.

Whichever camp emerges the winner, AI is with us, and is not going anywhere, except further into the corners of our lives.

Get used to it!

 

Is Taylor Swift the greatest marketer of the last 20 years?

Is Taylor Swift the greatest marketer of the last 20 years?

 

 

There are many contenders from around the globe for the mantle of ‘GOAT”, or at least of the last 20 years.

The obvious choice might be Steve Jobs, whose single-minded pursuit of all the factors that coalesce into great, long lasting, and commercially effective marketing culture is unparalleled.

You might nominate Elon Musk. He reshaped the auto industry worldwide, made batteries sexy, and figured out how to create a reuseable rocket, before imploding by renaming Twitter ‘X’.

How about Jeff Bezos who figured we would buy books online and turned that idea into a retail behemoth that has reshaped markets.

Some might add the foul mothed Gary Vaynerchuck to the list, whose ability to promote himself while talking about himself is unmatched.

Then there is a small number of genuinely original marketing thinkers and academics: Seth Godin, Mark Ritson, Byron Sharp, Roger Martin, and Scott Galloway.

Add in a few hands-on practitioners like Angela Ahrendts, Richard Branson, Marc Pritchard, and a trio of Aussies who changed the world, Melanie Perkins, and the Atlassian duo of Farquhar and Cannon-Brookes (whose core values include ‘don’t F%@k the customer’) and you have a good list.

However, my nomination would be from outside the usual ‘who is the GOAT’ box. It is a 34-year-old musician, songwriter, entrepreneur, and publicity machine, who has added tens of billions to the GNP of the US.

Taylor Swift.

I could not identify one Taylor Swift song, and I do not know if she even has any musical talent, but she certainly is a truly great marketer!!

To have the world talking about you, (even a 72-year-old bloke in a blog post) to have massive fan clubs of ‘Swifties’ salivating over every new piece of iconography, hordes fighting to pay eyewatering amounts to get nosebleed seats in a 100,000 seat stadium, takes some talent.

What makes her so great? Indeed, what are the common characteristics of all those in the list?

  • Understands who her customers are, and applies relentless focus. Swifts core market is young women and girls. She has demonstrated mastery in engaging with that audience with the music, visual extravaganza, and personal storytelling that resonates. She is also a powerful role model, encouraging independence, ambition, creativity and determination, emotions to which those in her market all aspire.
  • Consistently creates value for customers, individually. It seems the ‘Swifties’ out there all see Taylor as someone they easily relate to personally, across a wide range of channels and media. She is consistently delivering experiences, based on the music and extravaganza shows, but supported by all sorts of adjacent activities, such as having Kobe Bryant, a superstar in his field, come on stage at a concert and wax lyrical about her kindness, generosity, and ‘grounded’ personal values. She tells Swifties what they want to hear, and even their parents have trouble arguing!
  • Is ‘the only one’. Marketing success is an outcome of meticulous attention to detail, and the communication of all those details in a package. It requires two types of activity that is an extremely difficult mix to get right. On one hand, you need to ensure ‘activation’. The calls to action that today generate the motivation to spend money to be a part of the party. On the other, it requires that long term investment be made that build a brand, an identity that engages and creates a long-term platform from which the activation and short-term revenue generators are launched. When done well, as in this case, there will be ‘only one’. Where else can a teenage girl find the excitement, engagement, communal vibe she gets from being part of a ‘Swiftie’ fan community?
  • Swift applies compounding leverage. Taylor has executed a masterful commercial strategy. Unlike almost all other entertainers, she has retained control of everything, and runs the whole shebang as the CEO of a large, volatile and very complex business entity. Her uncanny ability to generate ‘Buzz’ around everything she does, which is spread by wildfire word of mouth and unpaid media enables a continuous stream of ‘Swift-news’ which has fans hanging out for more. She provides the creativity, leadership, and alignment most CEO’s can only dream of across the diverse range of activity her business embraces.

Swift is touring Australia, starting later this month, with multiple sold out shows in Sydney and Melbourne. The hype is becoming all consuming: you even have to reserve a spot in the line to pick up your merch and get to the cash register at the exit of the ‘pop-up’ merchandise stores.

Header illustration is via DALL-E, everything else is ‘organic’

 

4 crucial questions to unlock the power of your advertising.

4 crucial questions to unlock the power of your advertising.

 

 

Last week I provided a template for a Customer Value Proposition. The template works well, but ‘Customer Value Proposition’ is a piece of marketing jargon which just means making a promise to your customers.

This presupposes that you actually know who your ideal customers are, and what sort of promise would be attractive to them.

In the January February 2024 Harvard Business Review there is an article called ‘The right way to build your brand‘ written by Roger Martin and two Co-authors. The article sets out research that proves the hypothesis that making a specific promise to customers is more attractive than a generic claim of some level of excellence. The specific promise is about the benefit a customer will receive with use of the product. A generic claim to greatness is just about the product.

It does not surprise that the first is more powerful than the second.

‘Your promise is your strategy’ is a sub headline towards the end of the article. When you think about it, the observation must be right. Strategy is a process of influencing factors over which you have no control in such a way that the subsequent behaviour of the customers benefits your enterprise rather than an alternative. Making a promise of performance in delivering an outcome desired by a customer is about the strongest driver of short-term behaviour I can think of.

Delivering on the promise, will build trust.

Right at the end the authors ask four crucial but simple questions that can be used to determine if a proposed advertising campaign is worth investing in:

  • Is the campaign based on a clear unambiguous customer promise?
  • Were customer insights used to identify a promise the customers value?
  • Is the promise framed in a way that is truly memorable?
  • Were product marketing, sales, operations, and customer service involved to ensure the promise will be consistently fulfilled?

To me, this sounds like a comprehensive framework by which to decide if a proposed communication campaign is a worthwhile investment.