Marketing & Social media reviews

One of the foundations of mass marketing was to be able to segment your market, geographically, demographically, behaviorally, brand preferences, and so on.

In the old days of mass media, it was really the only way to target messages at those most likely to be receptive, match the media selection to the characteristics of your target market.

But what has happened in the social world of networked consumers and crowd sourced comment and content?

An acquaintance runs a wonderful patisserie in a rejuvenated inner city location. It is pricey, but the value is there, reflected in the range, artistic presentation, great service, and above all, pastries to die for.  However, some of the comments on the review sites would lead to a conclusion that the products were overpriced, too fancy, and lacked character.

Standing in the queue on a Saturday morning just before Christmas, observing others, and listening to the comments, the penny dropped. Those in the queue were older, clearly successful, were regulars, and loved the place, whereas the casual buyer, the ones far more likely to leave a comment on a review site were most probably Uni students, on their way between the train station and the campus just down the road. These buyers were more liklely to want a cheap, filling,  snack rather than a tasty work of art.

The lesson: Do not believe all your read on social media review sites, any more than you believe all you read in a politicians press release.

6 Rules of successful e-sales

David Ogilvy, fount of Intellectual Capital and the orginal "Madman"

David Ogilvy, fount of Intellectual Capital and the orginal “Madman”

Business is based on relationships, and generally the relationship comes before the business. As a result, you have to find a way to identify those with whom a commercially sustainable relationship is possible, then offer them sufficient value for them to buy from you.

Broadly there are four common ways to go about this:

Meet them in person

Meet them over the phone

Beat them over the head with advertising (primarily a consumer strategy rather than B2B)

Meet them via some sort of social media.

However, a fifth option is emerging rapidly:

Engage them via some sort of attractive e-content, that encourages them to come to you. If you can actually figure out how to achieve this outcome, the return on your  investment in content will be huge.

So, the real question is what do you need to do to make the content compelling. Pretty simple, basic marketing stuff, perhaps so simple that most just gloss over it, offering insufficient thought, so here goes with a list:

  1. Define who your ideal customer is, and “e-talk” to them, in their language, looking at your offering from their perspective, not yours.
  2. Make sure the content interesting, informative, offers distinctive Intellectual Capital that conveys your proposition clearly.
  3. Be clear about the value they will derive from a relationship
  4. Ensure the post, blog, whatever it is, can be easily shared, and encourage that sharing
  5. Have a call to action, the Rule number 1 of direct marketing!
  6. Relentlessly monitor responses, and experiment with the message and they way it is packaged.

When you are doing all that, you are being smart at blogging, or social media, does not matter what you call it, you are using the power of the digital age to engage, and create the opportunity for a sale.

Concentration of choice

Modern life gives us an array of opportunities to go somewhere, physically or digitally, and have presented to us a huge range of choice in any category of interest we may have.

There is a paradox here.

Concentration of anything, attracts those who may be interested in purchasing to the location, whilst creating the hurdle for those hoping to make a sale of  differentiating their offer from everyone else in the concentration.

This morning I was waiting for a meeting in a café in a local shopping strip that is little more than a concentration of cafes, bistros, and dining of all sorts. I was struck by the breadth of choice, and the resulting challenge of differentiation for the operators.

The café I was in is one of about 7 or 8 within 150 meters, all selling good coffee, a range of simple, tasty menu items, but all pretty much the same to a casual visitor. I wonder what would happen if one of them started roasting their own coffee, creating that  intoxicating smell, and the opportunity to tell a story about the beans, why the tastes varied, where they came from, and how the skills of the barista influenced the outcome. They may also make a bit of extra margin.

The provision of a cup of coffee is pretty commoditised, buying roasted beans from one of the roaster/distributors is a transaction where the individual café has little leverage in the price negotiation, but there appears to be plenty of margin in the roasting business.  Seems pretty obvious to me.

Revenue generation, and a sales metaphor

Some informal research I completed recently amongst businesses in my “patch” turned up a surprising result.

One the questions I asked was “what is the most important job in your business?

The surprise was that so few respondents nominated “sales” at all, let alone in the top three.

When you think about it, without sales to pay for the apparently more important functions like, HR, Marketing, OH&S management, engineering, NPD&C, and all the rest that got a mention, all those more fashionable functions will not be around.

Has “Sales” become its own metaphor?

Sales is often an entry level role personified by the keen young bloke (or gal)  with the brief-case, glib tongue, and “crash or crash through” attitude to human relations, and as a result is being left behind in the corporate furr-ball. Do well in sales, and you might be promoted to marketing.

Perhaps we should rename sales “Revenue Generation”. Call it what it is, focus more on those carring the direct responsability to conduct conversations with those who write the orders, and perhaps that might focus the mind a bit better?

Marketing is demand generation

Sales forecasting is a common activity, you need to know how much revenue is going to be generated in the coming months. Usually it is done by sales, usually by a straight extrapolation with a few adjustments, and the only thing you know for sure is that it will be wrong.

How cool would it be if your marketing people were able to forecast revenue with some accuracy?

Marketing is an investment in revenue generation, which is an outcome of demand, so it would seem sensible to focus attention on demand in the market, not what sales you did last month.  Mindset is important. When you treat something as an expense, it is easy to chop and change based on short term conditions, but when it is an investment,  it has longer term implications, and what could be more important than an investment in revenue generation???

To truly be treated as an investment, there must be a reliable ROI calculation that can be made, which means the collection of data, and the agreement on a set of metrics to be applied.

There are lots of tools emerging that claim to automate the marketing process, and generally they do it well, using the traditional sales tunnel metaphor connected to the marketing tools of the net. Whilst it is creating another source of operational complication necessary to get the data, it should be seen as a part of the investment strategy.

However, the mindset change is simple. Recognize  that the role of marketing is to create demand, and the cost of using all the tools of branding, innovation, channel selections, and all the rest,  are the costs implementing those investment decisions.

5 reasons you lost the sale

Sales is a tough job, you win or you lose, with no middle option. Understanding those you lost is the key to improving future performance.

Over  30 years of engageing with sales people, managing sales forces, and doing sales training, it seems to me there are just 5 reasons that seem to be recurrent in a failed B2B sale.

  1. Failure to understand that a potential customer in not interested in what your product can do, or has done, just what it may do for them. Trying to sell the features of a product, rather than the benefit it delivers, tailored to the circumstances of the buyer is sales death.
  2. The power of incumbency is huge, vastly underrated in most cases. When getting a sale means someone else is missing out, the risks to an organisation, and the reputation of the one who makes the change can be significant, so failure to remove the risk usually leads to failure. The old adage “nobody ever got fired for buying IBM” still holds.
  3. Failure to communicate and convince the decision-maker. I have seen huge efforts go into making sales, and as the effort drifts, it becomes apparent that the one who makes the decision, the Yes/No person, is not engaged, and often not even known.
  4. Lack of up front resources, or content that serves as an alternative to the traditional sales effort. In this day of the net being used as a primary information source, it is often the case the specifications of a purchase have been determined, and  a purchase decision made, before a potential supplier is aware of the process. The  processes of qualifying a lead,  supplying information that contributes to a specification, building relationships, and determining price and delivery requirements,  previously the function of sales has moved on line, the only variable left is the “who will supply”  question.
  5. Price. This is almost always the reason that gets cited as the one that broke the deal, but usually it is just a convenient excuse when any of the other four above have kicked in, and the explanations just get too complicated. It is the “Dear John” of the purchasing officer.