Common sense it often not common.

The case for employing intelligent people, and letting them get on with their jobs exercising common sense has been made again and again. In this lovely example of the hubris of rules, Safeway in Honolulu ensured they stuffed up by following a voluminous rule book, the substitute for trust in the common sense of your employees.

What damage has this stupidity done to the Safeway brand, and will any amount of advertising about how they care for their customers and their families wipe out the lasting impression forged by the news story of their stupid insensitivity and lack of care.

Innovation, does yours make it?

Every product manager I have ever seen sees his/her pack change, flavor extension, or new size as an innovation, and every marketing manager who lets this mediocre stuff take up valuable time, the only resource that is really irreplaceable, is culpable.

Sometimes, just sometimes, a genuine innovation emerges, and the common feature is that they almost always emerge from a culture that values their own resources, and that of their customers to the exclusion of all the usual puffery. What is left is the genuine hyping of something new, that needs at least some explanation, as it does not fit into any existing, neat categories.

Apple, Ideo, Cisco, Toyota, and a few others do it, others try and copy, change the look, but the value proposition is a copy. There is a new calculus of innovation easy enough to see if you know what to look for, really hard to do. 

 

The most important profit centre

Peter Drucker often condensed seemingly complicated concepts into pithy quotes of the blindingly obvious.

One I came across the other day is “There is only one profit centre that counts – customers”

It seems this statement of the obvious is often lost in the razzle dazzle of bullshit and self serving, non value adding nonsense that inhabits many organisations.

Next time you are faced with a pile of the aforementioned internal stuff, ask yourself a few simple questions:

 “what would a valued customer think about all this?

“Would my customer see this as an activity that they are prepared to pay for?

“How does this impact on my customers experience with the product and organisation?

Pretty simple questions, but answering them and acting accordingly will radically increase the productivity of your marketing expenditure. 

 

 

Customer churn and the quality of sales

One of my clients is in a pretty difficult spot.

Having lost a major contract, simply on price from an offshore based competitive supplier to his supermarket customer, he finds himself in the position where his overheads will eat him alive quickly without very painful commercial surgery. 

Over a period of time we have been discussing the Quality of his sales Vs the Quantity of sales, but assembling and allocating the resources to execute a change in the customer base has proven easy to say, very hard to do.

 It is fine to obsess about the sales revenue line,  but rather than just consider the quantity of sales, the quality is just as, if not more important. Had the volume he did with the supermarket been spread around 3 customers who were less likely to go offshore looking for a better  price, even accepting the higher transaction costs, he would today be far better off.

Many businesses, particularly service businesses like insurance and Telcos factor in customer churn, and spend lots of marketing dollars to replace the customers they will lose through poor service, pricing, competitive deals and so on. Directing a small percentage of those dollars to better engaging with and servicing existing customers to reduce churn would be far better.

It is the quality of sales that should be measured, not just the quantity.

 

FMCG duopoly under pressure?

It seems that new ACCC chief Rod Sims is getting serious about the reality of the power of the two major supermarket retailers.

At the same time, Andrew Reitzer  MD of Metcash is giving the ACCC a headache over his presumptive execution of the purchase of Franklins from Pick n’ Pay before the Federal court had ruled, simply on the basis that the business was bleeding cash, and the transaction had to be done, even at the risk of the consequences of  an adverse finding.

An interview by Alan Kohler of  Reitzer and the accompanying commentary give a great insight into the thinking behind the only real alternative to the power of Coles and Woolworths.

The overwhelming power of Coles and Woolworths has nevertheless not stopped the evolution of niche retailers like Harris Farm, competitive regional supermarkets like Drakes and Ritchies, and market entry of Aldi and Costco. The downward pressure on purchase price has however wrecked havoc on the Australian food manufacturing  sector, with very few left, and those that are in pretty shallow water, with the only really large domestically owned manufacturer left, Goodman Fielder performing poorly

I can only hope that in the new environment of more aggressive review of the retailers, that the plight of the domestic manufacturing sector  is adequately considered.

 

Poor service encourages customer revenge

Dave Winer, one of the earliest bloggers, prolific web publisher, and a key developer of the RSS technology so many of us use daily, has made many pithy statements worth remembering, but I was reminded of one over the weekend as the silly GASP customer complaint “thingie” went viral.

Dave opined  “if you don’t want me to slag off at your product, don’t have a shit product”. A retailer sells goods, but the service is a part of the offering  to customers, so irrespective of weather or not a purchase is made, it is in the retailers interests to have them leave with a smile on their face.

The dresses at Gasp may be worn by so called stars, but the failure by the self proclaimed sales superstar  to recognise that individuals can now extract a substantial revenge for poor service via social media should ensure his superstardom is exercised elsewhere, perhaps serving petrol at the local Woolies where he cannot do much damage to his employers brand.