What ‘digital transformation’ is not!

What ‘digital transformation’ is not!

 

It happened again over the weekend.

I had a conversation with a bloke who runs a medium sized business, and is embarking on what he called a ‘digital transformation’.

In other words, he is paying someone to build a website.

Another example of someone who is probably about to be badly disappointed, and lighter in the pocket.

A website is not a digital transformation, it is a piece of marketing collateral, and like every other piece, needs to have met and passed a few basic tests:

What is its purpose?

Who is my customer?

How is it different to others in a similar space?

What problem does it solve?

How do you want visitors to feel?

What do you want those visitors to do next?

 

If that is not all obvious in the first glance, start again.

The greatest cost in building a website is not  the technology, that is now almost completely commoditised, it is in the generation of the content in response to the answering of these simple questions. Failure to deliver to a site visitor something of value to them that creates at least curiosity to  learn more from you, means they will leave, and probably never come back. While there is  no dollar value to that outcome you can easily count, it is in reality the greatest cost in not having a site that works for you: lost opportunity and revenue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three critical success factors of a newsletter.

Three critical success factors of a newsletter.

A colleague has a newsletter, he emails it to his list on an irregular basis as he has something he  thinks of interest to say. When I unsubscribed, he rang me, angry that I had done so, after all I am known personally, and have an interest in  the topic.

Compiling a newsletter can be a hugely valuable tool in the marketing armoury, I subscribe to several that are on my ‘must read’ list. However, my time is limited, and my inbox stuffed with rubbish, the unintended consequence of being curious in this digital age.

Apart from some basic errors, like an absolute lack of any visual attraction, and questionable editing, I pointed out he has ignored some of the marketing basics that simply have to be covered in this day of competitive tsunamis of information coming at us from all angles. So I gave him some gratuitous advice based on what makes me wait for those few newsletters I value.

Respect my Time.  Time is the only totally none renewable resource we have, I do not want to waste any of it, and the demands on it have multiplied geometrically over the last decade. Therefore, I prune from the bottom. If you want a ‘sticky’ audience for your newsletter, treat your audiences time as being way more valuable than your own, and they might stick around.

Create Value. The corollary to not wasting peoples time, is to deliver great value. If all you are doing is regurgitating other people’s stuff, how does that add value? It is also true that people value different things, so your newsletter has to be a source of value across a few domains in which your readers live, and not all of it will have a commercial value. Considering the sources of value to your primary potential reader, and being sure you can consistently deliver,  should be a foundation step before you contemplate allocating the resources necessary to build a newsletter.

Create a community.  The advice of all the pundits is to ‘Build your list’. Rubbish. If all you have are email addresses, you are no different to every other hopeful spammer out there. The value of the list you have is not in the  numbers, but in what the receivers do with the information you send them. I would rather have a community of 100, that waits for the next newsletter, consumes the content, comments, shares, and feels like their time has been well spent, than a list of a million, 90% of which get caught up in the spam folder.

None of these three are easy, in fact, they will consume considerable resources, way  more than their short term value would indicate is sensible. However, if you are in for the long term, great, a newsletter can be constructed and encouraged to evolve that will be ‘sticky’ in a sea of mundane crap.

Newsletters such as the John Deere publication  ‘The Furrow’ survive because the follow these unspoken rules. ‘The Furrow’ have been serving a their readers since the 1895, the Michelin Guide since 1900, just two examples of newsletters that have become synonymous with content  marketing success delivering brand longevity.

 

7 tips on  how not to be boring while presenting.

7 tips on  how not to be boring while presenting.

As small business owners, we are often called on to speak publicly, and like most people, find that intimidating, and for some uncomfortable to the point of nausea.

There are many pieces of advice on how to structure a presentation, thousands of them on the web, and a few contributions from this site, but little about ‘how’ to speak beyond the very good advice on body language.

For most the degree of discomfort is brought on by fear.

Fear of making a dill of yourself

Fear of forgetting the important bits

Fear of boring your audience.

All can be addressed using a few simple things, that will not remove the instinctive fear of being the one outside the herd that in evolutionary times became a tigers breakfast, but at least will give you a few tools to beat the beast off.

Do not repeat to them what they already know.

Most speakers just repeat lots of stuff in the public domain, things most already know, or they pimp their companies and products.

Both are as boring as batshit.

You have been given the privilege of controlling the time of others, and the status of expert by whoever is organising the event you are speaking at, do not waste it by repeating boring stuff. Even if all you do is reverse the usually quoted factoids, and adding a bit, it will be more interesting. For example, instead of just stating ‘8% of transactions are now carried out ‘on line’,  say ‘while 92% of transactions are still carried out in person,  75% of purchasers do extensive research on line before you see them in the shop. How should that impact on your marketing strategies?’

Do not speak about things where you have only superficial knowledge.

Tempting as it is for some of us to speak at the opening of an envelope, resist the temptation unless you can genuinely impart some relevant and useful knowledge to the audience. Knowing you have valuable information that others will benefit from makes the process of imparting it that much easier.

Do not read to them what they can see.

Reading slides back to an audience is an absolutely sure fire way to ensure they all dive for their phones to check the Facebook update or what their  mother in law is doing for dinner. I cannot believe how often I see this, we have all seen it, yet  many allow themselves to knowingly bore the pants off the audience by doing it themselves. It is simply a response to fear, we can wrap ourselves in a sheet that excludes others, removing the presentation obligation to ‘connect’ with the audience.

PowerPoint has destroyed our instinct to be interesting when we speak, to hold the audience’s attention.

Resist the siren song of PowerPoint. When you use it, which is in most cases, always use it as no more than a memory jogger and to keep you moving along to a plan by having no more than a couple of words on a slide, but using it as a way to communicate in simple graphic manner the point that you are currently making. If you cannot condense that part of the discussion to a single graphical representation, remove the whole thing.

Do not just give them your opinion.

An expert speaker always has a point of view, but to be truly persuasive, that point of view will be based on solid facts, research, and data. Deliver that data, while articulating how you used it to form the views you have. Demonstrate the links between cause and effect. Failure to do this effectively is a large part of why we no longer trust politicians. While they are often slick talkers, they just give us opinions, and mostly we know they are not their private opinions, just the convenient line of the day, without any foundation of relevant fact and cause and effect links.

Do not stand still.

Particularly, do  not stand still behind a lectern.  When speaking, the stage is your domain, dominate it by moving around, using it to make your points, engage with the audience, match your voice to the point you are making, and be interesting physically. Back to evolutionary psychology, the tiger will have less chance at breakfast if the target is moving, so  move!

Do not just recite, tell stories.

Imagine your audience is one of your kids to whom you are telling a bed-time story, and you want more than anything for it to be memorable for them. To be memorable, every story has a structure. A beginning, an end, and a middle bit, drama, tension,  villains, heroes, laughter and sadness, suspense, and a point that you are trying to make. Use as many of them as possible in your presentation, with particular attention to the point to be made.

Do not end with thank you for coming.

You have been given the status of expert, someone worth listening to, by whoever has organised the gathering. Do not surrender that status by thanking the audience for all being there, for their attention. Instead, demonstrate why the investment of their time has been worthwhile, by telling them what to do next.

When you manage all that, I guarantee that not only will you have been of benefit to the audience, you will probably have enjoyed the experience, at least just a bit, and you will be better for the practice next  time.

 

Three metrics by which to measure the value of marketing content.

Three metrics by which to measure the value of marketing content.

All marketing content I have ever seen is driven by one, or a combination of three things:

  • Vanity
  • They have something to sell
  • They have something to say.

There is always some overlap, but when you dig deeper, the motivation is always one of the three, and by a vast majority, one of the first two. To be clear, ‘Content’ is everything you post, from a thoughtful and original marketing blog post you wrote, to a research paper published elsewhere, to a cat photo.

However, the most successful content is when you have something to say, an idea you want to articulate and spread, a perspective that throws light on a question.

It becomes pretty easy with some level of objectivity, to put some numbers against these simple measures, even vary the sizes of the ‘bubbles’ to reflect the relative size visually.

When the purpose of a piece of content is to inform, educate, enlighten, and that purpose is met, financial outcomes may follow, but they should not be the objective, they are the outcome of great content.

What is your purpose for your content?

 

 

 

The ‘Rocking Horse Shit’ story.

The ‘Rocking Horse Shit’ story.

Years ago in a corporate strategy retreat that was also a reason to have a nasty headache on Thursday morning, we had a session on responding publicly with little or no notice. The disciplines required to be able to speak publicly with clarity and authority, while delivering the necessary message without the benefit of any preparation time.

Big call for most of us.

In the session, the presenter gave us a number of techniques, all of which I remember and use today, but one in particular stuck.

Do everything in groups of three” he told us.

Three has a rhythm that both enables us to assemble, remember and recite back complex thoughts, and it enables us to instantly respond to a question or proposition in a logical and clear manner.

The presenter had given us a pep talk on some of the techniques, with emphasis on the ‘Three’ method, and finished by offering to speak for 10 minutes on any topic we chose to nominate. From the  following silence finally came the suggestion ‘Rocking horse shit’  from a jaded member of the sales team.

He proceeded to entertain us for 10 minutes on the differences that could be detected in rocking horse shit depending on the wood the rocking horse was made from, and two other variables. I still remember that Oregon originating RHS has a sweeter smell that that emanating from a horse made from a more exotic material like mahogany, but the best came from a horse made from the wood of the tropical and now rare Sandalwood tree.

All was arranged into logical groups of three.

This memory of this lesson was triggered by the wasted ½ hour I spent last week being tortured by a rambling, and monotonic delivery of what should have been interesting information.

There has been so much written about how to make presentations interesting, engaging and therefore useful, that it eludes me how supposedly intelligent people can still deliver this sort of crud, destroying any value the information may have, and their reputation at the same time.

Having the opportunity to make a presentation is a gift. Organisers are giving you the status of being an authority, having something worth saying, and the audience is giving you their most valuable resource: their time and attention. To waste either is an insult to both.

 

Photo credit: JohnBoy84 via Flikr

Will Apples ad barrier slow down Gooface?

Will Apples ad barrier slow down Gooface?

In September last year (2016), Facebook conceded publicly that they had over-estimated the average  time viewers spent on video on their site by 60-80%. They did not tell us how long they had known of this ‘error’ but I suspect it was for  quite a while, as they aggressively pushed the ‘video first’ bandwagon.

It does not seem to have dented the volume of money going into the coffers of the GooFace (Google/Facebook) digital advertising duopoly, although it may have slowed a little after Mark Pritchard, the CMO of Procter and Gamble with an ad budget in the billions fired both barrels at the stupidity, complicity and fraud that underpins the digital advertising industry.

Digital advertising has been blighted not just by hype, hyperbole, fraud, but by tracking, and we know it is a blight, because something like 700 million devises now have ad blockers installed, and the big platforms are increasingly removing the ‘skip ad’ option that was initially in place.

GooFace make almost all their money from ads, and cross site tracking is a fundamental part of their arsenal, which they will protect at all costs. Making all sorts of claims supported by flimsy data, and more hyperbolic assertions (I suspect they will make tobacco companies look like beginners when they get a bit more practice) is to be expected. Apple  by contrast make almost no money out of advertising, so has loudly rattled the cage by announcing a new feature on an upgrade of Safari that  prevents cross site tracking.

Brilliant.

I wonder who will follow suit, as the march of subscription services without ads together with the blockers, must be biting deeply into advertising effectiveness, assuming we could see and analyse the data objectively.

Follow up Nov. 8, 2017.  Has the charm offensive stated?  This article in Marketing Week would suggest it has.