The data or the story

I recently sat through what should have been a very interesting presentation. The proposition fascinating, the data extensive,  the qualifications of the presenter exemplarity. It is a pity, but a few minutes after it was over, none of the data was remembered.

All I can now recall is the scene setter the presenter used, the story he told which in his mind was just a warm up to the real stuff, the data that made the argument.

To me, the scene setter was the whole story, the data just a way to fill in a boring 25 minutes, and almost completely dispensable.

The lesson in this is that the social interaction we experience, or that are shared with us, are powerful conveyors of a message we recall, understand, and possibly act upon.

All the data in the world cannot do more than support the case, fill in the detail, and create quantitative foundations out of qualitative hypotheses. but it will always be the stories that stick in our memories.

The “welcome quotient”

Social media is a part of the marketing toolbox, an increasingly important one, so why does it so often get shuffled out to the side, assigned to the 20 year old intern, when it can have a profound impact on your customers and market?.

Marketing is all about demand generation, it is a very wide set of activities, behaviors, and  attitudes that build an expectation of brand and pr0oduct performance. It covers  everything from the usual promotional and advertising stuff people think about, to the little things, the cleanliness of the company logoed delivery truck, ( I always recall the shiny red Arnotts vans, to me they are a metaphor for the brand, sadly, there is not even a good photo on the web) to the way the receptionist answers the phone, and many other things. The “welcome quotient” of the brand. 

We do all this stuff in the real world, but ignore much of it in the digital one, simply by ignoring the expectation that visitors want to feel as welcome digitally as they are personally.

Many websites are distinctly unwelcoming, muddled, untidy, hard to navigate and offering little encouragement to engage further. This post by Jay Baer lists 11 reasons people do not engage, and is a great list of the common problems I see, most of which are r4elatively easily addressed.

Social Media is older than Facebook

Nearly 500 years ago, March 1517 to be exact, Social media was born, and rapidly demonstrated its power. On that warm spring day, Martin Luther “posted” his list of “95 Theses on the power and efficacy of Indulgences” on the local social media site, the church door, and inadvertently started a movement that would split the church. His individual action was just a single one, protesting at the aggressive marketing of Indulgences by church authorities, but to have the effect it did, required a whole bunch of other things to be aligned to take off. Similarly, the self immolation of shopkeeper Mohamed Bouazizi in Tunisia in 2011 focused the unrest in Tunisia , that led to the replacement of the Tunisian dictator.

Martin Luther was outraged that locals could buy “indulgences” sold by church clerics, which acted as paid confessions, removing the ritual of the confession and contrition, and wanted to stimulate a debate at the university on the topic. What happened is that a local printer who had one of these new fangled printing presses reproduced the 95 theses, and sold them,  rapidly creating a movement that had all the hallmarks of a modern social media movement.

As Clay Shirky tells it, there are three conditions that lead to a social media led change:

Everyone knows the system is broken

Everyone knows that everyone knows the system is broken

Everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone knows the system is broken.

When you get to this third level, it all blows up apart, and that is exactly what happened in Germany in 1517, and again in 1989 when the wall fell, in Tunisia in 2011, and is still rolling through the Arab world.

The tools of social media have changed, but the nature of human activity and collaboration has not. In the 21st century we want the same things our forebears wanted, and are prepared to fight for them, it is  just that the tools are a bit different.

Neuromarketing

Marketers are becoming increasingly sophisticated in the ways they leverage understanding of how the brain works to build competitive advantage.

20 years ago most marketing positioning, segmentation and communication was based around demographic factors, but we have been increasingly understanding the linkages between a whole range of factors and individual behavior in a rang of circumstances as we have been able to collect and analyse data. This understanding has evolved to the point  where the old fashioned demographic segmentation and positioning now looks like a Model T in the 2012 Paris motor show.

The evolving marketing skill is understanding how the brain works in order to gain commercial advantage, work that is based on academic medical research. But this research is just conforming what good marketers have known for some time, albeit intuitively. Simon Sinek’s simple “Why What How” presentation that has garnered almost 10 million YouTube views is just a marketers interpretation of Neuromarketing being applied.

Graph Search loves friends

I opined previously that it appeared to me that Facebook had cracked the challenge of monetising their site by applying semantic search to their billion users and their networks with the introduction of  the “Graph Search” feature.

This post on the Social Media Examiner site goes into some detail about the way Graph search works, and when you think about it a bit, the value is huge to marketers, as it offers highly targeted search capabilities.

I am a tennis player, a member of a local club that has the almost unique distinctions of retaining its grass courts,  being a century old, and having many truly great players as former members. Funding the maintanence of the grass is an ongoing challenge, one that threatens the future of the club as membership declines with the lessening popularity of tennis, and the changing demographics of the local area.

There are a series of semantic searches I, and my fellow club members (assuming they use facebook, which many do not), can now easily undertake. Using these connections, through the “friends” networks, we can identify potential visitors and members, and market to those “friends” networks the joy of the game on grass, (particularly on a hot day), the value of membership based on the availability of grass, the heritage of the club, and the social aspects of the great game. The searches would look something like this:

Friends: who like tennis,

     who like tennis and live in the Sydney inner west,

     who like playing tennis on grass,

    who would like to try playing tennis on grass,

     and so on.

As those searches are employed, ads by sellers of tennis equipment, marketers of sporting brands, tennis coaches, even lawn care equipment would benefit from the highly targeted, and empathetic environment.

Potentially a gold-mine for marketers, as the value of Graph search to those networked on facebook is substantial. Suddenly Facebook looks like it has the potential to pay a dividend to those donkeys who got sucked in by the IPO, and did not get out fast enough, unlike young Mr. Zuckerberg.

 

 

 

 

Attention deficit disorder.

20 years ago you could block book advertising across three TV channels, a few newspapers, and radio stations, and be pretty sure you would catch almost  everybody.

Not now.

No matter how much you spend, you simply cannot block book all the channels that now attract our attention. The last 20 years has created communication channels inconceivable a generation ago.

Like time, attention is a non renewable resource, there is only so much of it, and unlike 20 years ago, there are almost infinite opportunities for us to spend our attention.

Marketers therefore have to reverse the order in which they approach gaining your valuable attention, as no longer can they easily access mass attention by intrruption. Now they have to earn the right to communicate, person by person, as just turning up and interrupting you will not work. Even if we happen to be there to be interrupted, we will ignore you without a very good reason to give you some of our valuable attention.