Why many small businesses fail with digital marketing.

Why many small businesses fail with digital marketing.

Feb 16, 2016 | Marketing, Small business

Imagine you discover a compound in your kitchen that will cure cancer.

You know it works because it cured your mother.

That would be a really amazing feeling, to be able to make a huge difference to peoples lives, and find instant wealth at the same time.

Imagine further that you did  not tell anybody.

Your Mum knows, as do your siblings and a few others close to you, the old family doctor is sceptical, and your neighbour who goes to church a lot is downright dismissive, because it is clearly a miracle that has brought the cure, not a chemical.

The barrier between you and success is twofold:

  1. Lack of credibility
  2. Lack of an audience.

So it is with  marketing.

The newest iteration of marketing, digital, is not a cure-all for an ordinary product, non competitive price, lack of distribution underdone value proposition, or anything else that normally leads to failure in the market place, it is just an additional set of options to understand and manage.

You still need both the product customers want and the audience that knows about it.

One without the other is not of much value.

Most small businesses fail one if not both the tests.

No matter how great their product, how responsive their service, without an audience, people who know about what you do and care enough not just to shower praise, but to go out and buy it, and encourage others to do the same, they will fail.

Success with digital marketing is not easy, despite the nonsense to the contrary, but it is a capability now as basic as having a good phone manner was 20 years ago.

 

 

 

 

Why did Thomas Dux really fail?

Why did Thomas Dux really fail?

Feb 10, 2016 | Branding, Marketing, retail

There is a whole lot of discussion around the progressive closure of Thomas Dux stores by owner Woolworths, and the assumption that it will be closed down if a trade sale does not evolve.

Maybe there is a plan to save it, but I cannot see it, and having bought some rubbish grapes at an inflated price in the Lane Cove store during the week,  I do not know what it might be.

Not a lot of the discussion actually addresses the strategic failure that is the foundation of the commercial failure, just its superficial symptoms.

Strategic failure seems to have found its way into Woolies DNA over the past 15 years or so. They became so financially dominant in supermarkets that they forgot that they still have consumers to keep loyal, suppliers to keep in business, and competitors very keen to eat their lunch. They have done OK in petrol, well in liquor, absolutely bombed in hardware, poorly in general merchandise , and missed office supplies, electrical and furnishings completely, and are fiddling around with odd things like pet health insurance. Not a lot of logic in that mix.

I have watched Dux closely since the launch,  had a number of clients products listed, and visited all the Sydney stores multiple times since the first Lane Cove store opened. Until a short while ago, I really thought they would defy the corporate odds, and make it work.

The apparent failure is a sad day for the specialty end of the Australian food manufacturing industry, what is left of it, one less way to reach consumers.

So, with the clarity of (almost) hindsight, where did they go wrong?

 

Confused business model.

Whilst Dux had separate management, they operated out of the Woolworths warehouse, using the WW back office systems and presumably KPI’s which are all focussed on mass merchandise, stock turn and margin. This makes sense to the accountants who seek efficiencies but in the end forces the big brother behaviour on the upstart sibling who needs to do things differently to survive and prosper.

They forgot their “Why“.

Perhaps they never had it beyond a kneejerk response to an upstart competitor. The slogan “Inspiring your passion for food” is at least a half way decent one, until you see packets of mass market products available in the Woolies and Coles stores next door at lower prices. As a consumer, going into Dux , the presence of such items is inconsistent and diminishes any claim to a differentiated and valuable consumer value proposition.

Value delivery.

Consumers are not stupid, there is a limit to the price they will pay for something with a fancy name, fuzzy claim and benefit, and not much else. Pushing the prices beyond that limit in order to boost the GM% is pretty silly, because you do not bank percentages, just dollars. It is a fine line, but by observation, they got it wrong as much as they got it right, which is not enough.

Discounters are not the competition.

Giving in to the accepted wisdom that discounters are winning and that Dux is competing for the same consumer dollar is nonsense.  Consumers are looking for an experience, for specialist products not available in mass retailers.  They started well with their “foodies”, in store chefs available to give advice and recommendations, but the enthusiasm for this potentially differentiating strategy seems to have waned over time. Behaving like a discounter in some Sku’s but like a high end, fancy pants deli in others just confuses consumers, and I suspect their own staff.

What you will not do.

Strategy is, amongst other things, about what you will not do, as much as it is about what you will do. Thomas Dux seems to have forgotten this lesson and succumbed to the temptation to stock SKU’s that did not add to the positioning of Dux as a retailer on whom you could rely on to deliver quality and differentiated specialist food products along with a level of service well beyond the usual expectation. This confuses and devalues the brand. Thomas Dux is like any other brand in a development phase, it requires absolute focus on what makes you different and better. So why can I buy Kelloggs Corn flakes and Blend 43 coffee there?

It takes time.

Dux has been around for a while now, perhaps 10 years? That should have been enough time to establish a defensible place in consumers minds when it is clear there is a segment looking for an alternative to the mass market supermarkets. I suspect that the financial pressure has increased markedly over the last few years as Woolies excursion into hardware drained group profitability. The net result was that the quarterly numbers mattered more than the long term, so savings were made by management, the sort of savings that delivered me the rubbish grapes the other day. If the grapes were not good enough to justify the price, they should not have been on the shelf. That sort of challenging culture requires time and continual effort to reinforce, and a reversion to a quarterly focus removes the management incentive to not sell grapes this week because they are not good enough, they need the margin today at the expense of tomorrow.

 

Meanwhile  Harris Farm, the original target of Dux appears to be powering along. Perhaps Woolies will rue the day they did not buy Harris Farm when they were still young and vulnerable. I understand they tried, but were given the finger by the venerable Mr Harris.  Perhaps they should have tried again, it would have been less costly to both their coffers and their reputation.

What do you think?

 

 

The dirty little secret of digital marketing.

The dirty little secret of digital marketing.

Feb 8, 2016 | Communication, Customers, Marketing, Small business

Achieving simplicity is really hard, we all know that in our guts.

There is however a huge difference between simple and superficial, and again, we all know that but tend to be persuaded to take the easy way out.

The development of a specific ‘Persona’ to which you target your marketing efforts is one of those seemingly simple  things we can now do with digital help, but in fact it is really hard.

Therefore, many make a token effort, and go away satisfied, but have in fact settled for a superficial result.

And then they wonder why the subsequent marketing efforts fail to deliver on the hype.

It is impossible to target a generic message to a 35-year-old middle-class working mother of two, and have it received in the manner you would wish. It’s much easier to target a message to Jennifer, who has two children under four, works broken hours as a lawyer, and is always looking for quick but healthy dinners and ways to spend more time with her husband and  kids, and less time on housework.

As a young marketing bloke we always developed a ‘target audience’ for everything we did.

In those  days they were generally demographic categories, which were pretty broad. If we were lucky and had big budgets, we had a Usage & Attitude study that gave us some insights into consumers behaviour, but were pretty superficial. The research relied on peoples memory, and willingness to actually recognise and admit to the behaviours that drove marketing decisions.

It was relatively rough and ready stuff.

Then  we used mass media to try and reach those demographic groups, hoping to find a few by chance who wanted to hear and act on what we were saying, or even were just prepared to listen.

Progressively we have been able to develop detailed pictures of customers and potential customers, those of our competitors, and those who might be interested in what we have to offer. We now can build a detailed understanding of their preferences and behaviour from a range of data sources,  can direct messages very specifically at very small groups of  individuals, and with many forms of media, specific individuals.

This power is unprecedented , and mostly it is ignored by small and medium sized businesses.

It enables the development of a four sided picture of those we want to reach.

Who they are

Where you can find them

Develop your target persona

Develop your target persona

What are their behaviours that are relevant to your value proposition

Why they should  buy from you

The flip side of the persona, the challenge  most marketers fail to understand sufficiency is that individuals now can avoid you should they choose. That array of digital targeting tools can be turned against the marketer, their messages in one way or another moved to the ‘Junk file’ never to be seen or acknowledged.

Why they should  buy from you, what makes your persona something relevant to a potential buyer?

Because you can solve a problem,  they like/trust you, and/or they engage and relate to you.

Successful selling is not about the transaction, it is the value you can deliver that is more  than the cost of the transaction, and it is about the empathy you can deliver.

In order to create a story potential customers can relate to, you need to develop some sort of story for the character.  Who they are, how they got here, what they have experienced, the obstacles overcome, their character flaws, all the things that make them human. You weave your own characters into the sales itch, and lead people to the conclusion you want them to reach, because you relate to them, they relate to you, your story is theirs.

This means you may need a few variations that accommodate differing ideal customer personas, but not too many or it becomes false and fabricated.

Let me know if I can help.

 

 

.

The power of “Why” in a sales pitch

The power of “Why” in a sales pitch

Feb 4, 2016 | Customers, Marketing, Social Media

One of the standard problem definition techniques I use is the classic “5 why” process pioneered by Toyota. Just keep on asking “why” to peel back the layers pf the onion to get to the real problem, rather than just being satisfied that addressing the associated and superficial symptoms is enough.

You rarely get past 5 before the guts are on the table, I certainly never have.
It can be a tough and extended process, but it works.

It also works when you are on the receiving end of a sales pitch.

Late last year I sat with a client through a series of pitches by advertising agencies, all heavy on rhetoric and marketing cliché, but mostly a bit light on strategic and creative grunt.

‘Why do you think this idea will deliver the strategy’?

‘Why is it a great idea as you claim’?

‘Why do you recommend this media mix’?

‘Why do you believe these metrics are useful’?

All pretty valid questions I thought.

As one group of hopefuls left, one asked another not realising I had followed them out to offer a final handshake  “Why was he bloody there?”

Had they been able to answer any of the questions satisfactorily, they may have got the gig, but as it stands I suspect they have no idea why they missed out.

I rest my case.  .

The (almost) impossible task of brand building momentum. A personal story.

The (almost) impossible task of brand building momentum. A personal story.

Jan 29, 2016 | Branding, Customers, Innovation, Leadership, Marketing

What is  a brand?

When you think about it, a brand is a just a promise embodied in a product.

A promise of performance, and delivery of value.

It survives and grows, retains and builds relevance and attraction only when the promise is delivered.

Finding the promise that can be delivered in a way that is sufficiently different to make an impact is really difficult.  Making a promise that is the same as everyone else’s promise, and the brand becomes indistinguishable, just another label on the shelf.

30 years ago I was heading a marketing group that amongst other successes, relaunched ‘Ski’ yoghurt in Australia. The relaunch was a huge success, and over the following 3 years, our national market share went from single figures to well over 35% in a market growing at double digit rates.

There is a lot of patronising bullshit around about the way to build a brand, advice that sounds nice but is usually just a template that promises an outcome, a bit like the paint by numbers paintings an old aunt had adorning her walls. Not very good, and certainly not original.

So, I thought that the hindsight afforded by the almost 25 years since that  Ski relaunch might be valuable as you consider your own brand building exercise.

Following are the lessons I took away, often with the enlightenment that comes with hindsight, as the appearance of organisation and planning is a bit of a fiction, the real situation was considerably more chaotic as we juggled competing priorities, competitive and financial pressure, and all the jostling and risk mitigation that goes on inside big businesses.

 

Be different.

At the time conventional wisdom was that the fruit in yoghurt had to be mashed, the product homogeneous, that lumps of fruit were not good. All the research told us that consumers wanted their fruit yoghurt to be consistent with the fruit mashed and evenly distributed, and the launch of Yoplait a few years earlier had kick started a genuinely competitive race and significant market growth.

We relaunched Ski on the proposition  of taste. The best tasting yogurt, the only one with pieces of fruit. It completely distinguished us from the then market leader, Yoplait, and all other brands, and gave consumers who liked or did not mind whole fruit in their yogurt a real reason to buy Ski. Of course, some rejected it, but many did realise after trying that they did prefer it, and whilst there was a lot of supporting activity and pack changes, the market share of Ski zoomed. A few of the small producers copied us, but the market leader could not, as their whole manufacturing process was designed to deliver a homogeneous product.

The value of true differentiation backed by a brand promise that was carried out and of value to at least some consumers was clear.

Across the range Ski was so different that  it created new segments within  the yoghurt category, segments we owned because we created and named them, and which made competition hard and expensive for our opposition.

 

Get onto a roll.

When you have a line-up of innovations that do add value, you can roll them out progressively and the competitive impact is cumulative, you leave the competition struggling to catch up with your first one, and spending valuable marketing resources to stay in the game while you roll out the second, and third iteration. I would not claim that Steve Jobs knew anything about Ski, but that is the exact strategy that Apple used from the launch of the original iPod on.

In our case, we relaunched Ski with the different product as noted, but we also changed the naming conventions that had prevailed. For example, the low fat version changed from Ski Low Fat to Ski DeLite. Worked a treat, and went some way to redefining the low fat category. The next ‘roll’ of the dice was to relaunch the 1kg size into the now common rectangular packs. To that time all 1kg Packs had been round, as they were operationally easier and the packs were much cheaper. However, we noted that most female buyers, and they made up 90+%  of purchasers, could not easily handle the product in one hand, they did not fit on most refrigerator door racks, and were less than optimal on the retail shelves.

When we changed all this, sales of 1kg exploded, and gave us new retail distribution. We then followed up with Ski Double-Up, a product that had a range of ‘toppings’ in a separate compartment  of the pack, and a completely different yoghurt that emerged from the combination of new strains of culture and operational process innovation,  that revolutionised the market again, creating an entirely new category.

Your customers may not be who you think they are.

Innovation is a powerful way to attract fringe, lapsed or just reluctant buyers into a market. When we launched Ski Double-up the typical consumer was young, educated, and female.  Consumption by men of yoghurt was only about 20% of female. Ski Double-Up changed all that. Not only did it attract more men, they were significantly older in profile, those who would not touch ‘yoghurt’ as it has been with a barge-pole. They tried Double-Up, liked it, tried other versions, and became regular and loyal consumers, adding significantly to the scope and scale of the Ski brand.

 

Start with ‘Why’.

Defining the ‘Why’ of your brand is a foundation of all branding activity. The best articulation of “Why’ is the now famous TED talk by Simon Sinek.  A brand without a clear and distinctive ‘Why’ is just a label. Sinek uses Apple as an example several times, because as he says, ‘everyone gets it’ and they do. Apple is a branding icon, but not the only one. Recently I stumbled across a new brand from a start-up, one that is breaking new ground on a number of fronts, competing against some of the biggest and best marketers in the world, but will (I suspect) succeed on the strength of their “Why’. It is whogivesacrap toilet paper, purchased by consumers  direct rather than via retailers, with a very clear ‘Why’. Many, almost certainly most will not buy into the why, but enough will to make the brand and business a success, and they will do some good in the process.

The corporate benefit of ‘Why’ is that everyone in the business can buy into it, and the resulting culture can become a very powerful motivator and driver of performance. In our case, the ‘why’ was that we were producing a natural, healthy product, our workforce has all been taken into our confidence, and they were our market research as we ran taste group after taste group in the factory during the development process to get the variables right. When the products became very successful, those people  saw what their contribution had resulted in, and took great pride in it, making a huge contribution to improving the production efficiencies .

 

Sweat the small stuff.

Details matter, a lot. Steve Job’s obsession with the experience of opening a shipper containing an Apple product contributed  a core part to the brand identity of Apple. With Ski we pioneered amongst other things a  process that used a new and expensive printing process that both accommodated the square shape of the 1kg tub, and delivered crystal clear graphics. It was expensive and difficult, but  the attention to the detail that could have been dismissed for cheaper more utilitarian solutions paid huge dividends in volume, and profitability albeit at skinnier margins.

 

Be brave & committed.

Nothing really useful will evolve from just doing the same thing as others, but just a bit better. Being different means taking risks, being brave, pushing the envelope, all those clichés that mean someone has to be brave enough to open the door to the unchartered. That takes guts, rare in todays corporate world,  but around aplenty in small and medium sized businesses.

When we changed Ski 1kg to the rectangular tub, there was no way back. Over a week long factory shutdown, the old machinery for  filling the round tubs was removed, and the new rectangular filling machines installed. Had the change failed, there was no way back.

The steps we took with Ski were all brave at the time. We changed the dynamics and shape of the market, a seemingly obvious step,  but at the time it was sweaty palms all around.

 

You have to be smart.

The marketing group had some very smart people, but more than that, it was a collectively smart group. There was great collaboration and support, and the longevity of the group was substantial, which had offered the opportunity to make a few mistakes and learn from them. At a time when the average tenure of marketing personnel was about 18 months, we averaged 6 years, giving us a significant depth of market understanding and intelligence. Just as important, or perhaps more so, we had the support of the CEO of the division who was prepared to support and encourage the things we did, and I am sure his palms were sweatier than any others, although at the time it never showed. His confidence in us, and support in keeping the corporate drones at bay never wavered. Innovation is impossible without that sort of support from the top.

 

It is really hard to continue to succeed.

This is a warning.

If you succeed, when the applause is over and the credit appropriated, the corporate gnomes come out to play, those who do not understand the dynamics of a brand. If you go into a supermarket today, Ski is an also ran, it looks like it is back to single figure market share, a shadow of its former self we had built. The brand we developed was raped by the accountants and sycophants who killed the golden goose by greed, short ‘termism’ and stupidity, rather than continuing to nurture and invest. The temptation to do so will be strong, and it takes a CEO with brass ones to resist the siren call of the throngs and maintain the investment required.

That rot had started a year or so before I was toddled off. By that time the corporate structure had changed a couple of times, and I was unable to keep the support that had enabled the success in the first place in the face of the changed structure and personnel. Unable to stay quiet in the face of the short term lure of the margins instead of continuing the investment for the long haul, I insisted on being the resident ‘Cassandra’  and ended up paying the price.

As I wrote this post I had to shake myself that it was 25 years ago.

Seems like yesterday.

A lot has changed in the marketing landscape, but the essentials remain the same.

How to overcome the terror of public speaking and be seen as the expert.

How to overcome the terror of public speaking and be seen as the expert.

Jan 20, 2016 | Communication, Marketing

I prepare and give quite  a lot of presentations, and from time to time coach others as they prepare.

Speaking is a vital part of what I do, although I do not see myself as a professional speaker, just somebody with a point of view on a range of topics that can be of value to others, and I have learnt from my many stumbles.

Having the opportunity to deliver a presentation is a gift, someone is endorsing your expertise, giving you the benefit of their credibility, as well as offering the opportunity to demonstrate that expertise.

Gold.

It is also a fact that the presentations that do not work are almost always  the ones where the effort has not been invested in the preparation.

It is surprising to me how often people stuff it up, despite the time, effort, and stress, often to the point of nausea, that goes with the experience of preparation and delivery in front of a crowd, even a small one.

There are some common characteristics of the successful presentations, some of which I have written about on previous occasions, but was motivated to do so again by a friend facing a presentation he should be able to nail, because he has the knowledge and expertise, but utterly lacks the confidence to communicate in front of an audience there to hear him.

Summarised is the advice I offered from my experience.

Have a clear purpose.

The purpose is the one thing that holds the whole presentation together. Every comment, story, slide, movement and demo  should add to that purpose, it is the reason people came, or at least choose to give you their attention at the beginning. It is important to relate not just the information they were promised, but why it is sufficiently  valuable to them that you have made the effort to assemble your expertise on the topic so they can benefit from the information.

Find the story that illustrates the point you want to make.

Sometimes it may be a montage, but presenting is really storytelling by another name, and we evolved listening to stories, it is how we learn and comprehend. At heart we are all storytellers, we do it for our kids, and friends around the BBQ, in the pub, we use common language, instinctively use metaphors and similes, and often ‘air quotes’ to indicate uncertainty when we quote numbers. Why should it be any different in front of a formal audience? We just need to find the story that fits the purpose, and tell it with passion, commitment and authority.

Build empathy and intimacy.

Most find this hard, as it seems unnatural. Many years ago before giving my first major presentation in front of 1000 plus industry players I went and had some coaching. The thing that really stuck with me was a throwaway piece of advice. ‘It is not a presentation, it is a performance‘ I was told, followed by ‘most people in the audience will admire the fact that you got up, and be eternally grateful it is not them, feed on it’

From that starting point, if you are thoughtful, building some empathy can be pretty easy. Phrases  like “Imagine you were….” or ‘It was a stormy Tuesday night in the old rectory, and …..’

Building intimacy implies the audience sees you speaking only to them, grabbing and holding their attention, ‘I knew we were right when Susan said this one thing…..’ This cues everyone listening into focusing their attention on what you are about to say to the exclusion of everything else going on around them.

Words and Visuals.

They each have their place, don’t get them mixed up. Words belong coming from your mouth, they do not belong on a screen, that is where the visuals should be. If you make the mistake of putting your words on the slides, you cede the authority in the room, people will read the slides and not listen to you. Instead, if you put up an interesting visual that illustrates the point, the audience will listen to and remember the words. Slides offer a framework for the words, reminders of the points that need to be made.

Everyone prepares for a presentation differently, some write, rehearse then deliver the script word for word, others free-wheel around the framework. It does not really matter, so long as you retain the attention of the audience and make all the points necessary along the way. The critical thing to achieve is to leave the audience with a story that resonates, that delivers on your purpose.

Stagecraft.

Those lucky, and talented enough to be selected to go to NIDA spend 3 years learning about stagecraft, so a blog post cannot even scratch the surface, but there are a few basics.

  • Your physical presence and actions create a part of the visual and emotional experience that your audience has, it is literally a ‘stage’. How boring just to have someone driving a lectern as often seems to happen. Use the stage, move around,  map out your points using the space you have. When you have an important point to make, move forwards, to the middle, if you want to build suspense, move backwards, slowly. Use your hands to point, (finger) engage (open hands) and shape (move your arms in squares, circles)
  • Modulate and change your voice. The tone, speed, silences, and level at which you use that great tool, your voice, adds drama and colour to the delivery. Few things are worse than a monotone, and everyone will drift off very quickly no matter how good the material.
  • Contrast everything. Holding attention is aided by contrast, your voice, movements, use of visuals. Use contrast within the context of the words and visuals, and always with the purpose in mind as the glue. Ensure there is movement and colour relevant to the purpose of the presentation as it adds to the performance you are delivering.
  • Respect the audiences time, attention and expertise. Never go over time, in fact, be a few minutes quicker than they expect, and they will be grateful, as will the organisers. Even the very best speakers have trouble retaining full attention beyond about 25 minutes, so why do you think you need 40? Much better to limit yourself, and remove the extraneous material from your presentation, concentrating on the really important stuff, the bits that connect directly to your purpose.
  • Use props to make your point when appropriate, they are a visual metaphor, and can be remarkably effective at making the point, and being memorable.
  • As the presenter, you hold authority over the room. The audience will stand up if you ask them the right way, shake the hand of the stranger on their left, even do a silly dance at the end if you have delivered to them. Use the authority wisely, don’t abuse it or you will lose them forever. Don’t cede that authority you have been given, use it yo your advantage. I often see presenters giving away their implied authority by opening with with something like, “I am humbled to be here….“. You have the opportunity to build on the authority implied by the fact that you are the speaker, and leave the stage acknowledged by the audience as the expert, which adds to the memorability of your purpose, and your position as the authority on the topic.
  • Body language. If you look nervous, the audience reacts differently to someone who looks confident and in charge. The words might be identical, but the response to the speakers and retention of information will be entirely different. This TED-X talk deals just with how the palm of your hand impacts an audience, now add the rest of your body to the mix.
  • Never, never talk down to people, use terms or jargon that may not be understood, or try and demonstrate your expertise by dazzling with bullshit.

Practise.

I am amazed at how often I see people deliver their presentation for the first time live, in front of the audience. Practising is time consuming, and feels strange, but the more you do, the better the presentation will be. I have a very wise pot plant in my study, it hears all my presentations numerous times before anyone else has the chance. The only downside is that the feedback is a bit limited, so when I am ready, I also try it on a few indulgent and critical friends. Audiences like spontaneity, but even the very best performers practise their material relentlessly, so it is effortless, and seemingly spontaneous.  With that intimate knowledge of the material comes the potential follow a track that emerges from audience feedback, engage with them, or just “riff a bit”  without losing your place, as the core material is almost on autopilot.

I hope that all helps the next time you are faced with that thing that, in surveys at least, many of us  fear more than death, public speaking. This curated list of 8 TED talks contains a wealth of tips and is worth working your way through as you develop your presentation skills, or prepare for that scary experience.