Oct 16, 2015 | Collaboration, Customers, Marketing, Small business
local business is your business
Small business owners seem always struggle to find the ways to build their business. B2B, B2C, does not matter, the challenges are similar.
How do you identify, engage, then build towards a transaction and relationship with people to whom your product or service solves a problem, and adds value too their lives?.
In my local area, there are a significant number of networking groups, ranging from community based ones to expensive franchise operations. I am a member of two groups, plus a local chamber of commerce. It takes work, but they do deliver results. In observing the behaviour in these groups of those who are successful, there are some pretty common things that can most small businesses can learn to do better.
1. Elevator Pitch. It amazes me how few can state in a few words what they do, what problems they solves, what outcomes can be achieved, and why their services are worth consideration. It should not be hard, but it is. Developing a good elevator pitch should be a priority.
2. Think local. Most small businesses find most of their business in the local area. It seems therefore to make sense to invest in the activities of the local area, from being a voice in the community groups such as Rotary, to sponsoring the local kids sporting teams with playing gear. A little bit of time and effort, but very little money can go a long way in a community.
3. Be vocal. Communities offer all sorts of ways to engage and make it clear what you stand for. A builder might be a protector of the architectural heritage of an area, the local sports store agitate to turn the local dump into playing fields, a bike shop might be the lead voice in having some waste land rezoned to enable building a bike track. The list can be as long as your imagination.
4. Collaborate. Locasl can build scale by collaborating, cross promoting, and assisting each other in all sorts of ways. Again, being open to ideas and opportunities can reap large rewards. My local bottle shop holds tastings on a fairly regular basis. They secure the time of the winemaker of a high quality small winery, who then takes a small group through the current releases, a vertical tasting, or whatever is appropriate, and over the course of the evening, the Japanese café next door delivers some terrific ‘nibblies’ Everyone wins.
5. Leverage the network. Local networking groups of various types do deliver value, but like all things of value, success only comes with work. Others need to understand what you do, how you deliver value, why they should use you instead of an alternative, they need to find common ground and build some trust. Going to the meetings is just the start.
6. Referrals. An adjunct to the networking activity, it pays to ask for the job, or referrals. Network theory clearly demonstrates that the networks of those in your network are the most potent source of leads there is. Many people feel that asking for a referral is not good form, remove that notion from your mind. Members of a networking group are all there for the same reason, to build their business, so they will not mind, and so long as you are prepared to reciprocate.
7. Offers. Offering an incentive of some sort always helps. A friend runs a small suburban bistro, open 6 days a week. He is booked solid Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings, but has to carry the overheads of being open and able to provide services at other times. He is always creating offers of his slow times, two for one, a bottle of champagne on the table, cakes for birthdays, on and on, in order to get bums in seats in the slow times, and as a result has a thriving business, with many repeat customers across the week.
All this stuff can be done as a part of your general marketing activities, it adds a critical personal dimension very challenging and expensive to achieve with any form of media. The range of options for small businesses has never been wider, and never forget that people buy from people far more than they buy from businesses.
Oct 13, 2015 | Customers, Marketing, retail, Sales, Small business
Innovation in supermarkets
Small business suppliers to supermarket chains are substantially compromised by the lack of resources to innovate.
Peter Drucker stated 50 years ago that innovation is the only really sustainable competitive advantage, and the passage of events have proved him correct.
Commercial survival requires that you are able to continually innovate, or you rapidly find yourself left behind, simply because everybody else is.
Knowing this does not however, make the challenge any less daunting, especially in an environment like FMCG where the retail gorillas stamp on variation as a source of transaction costs, and are actively seeking to reduce SKU numbers by pushing housebrands.
Lets define what we mean by innovation for the purposes of this post.
It does not include business model and process innovation. Both are terrific ways towards commercial sustainability, are paths every business must follow, but have little to do with innovation from the customer perspective, at least in the short to medium term.
By contrast, product innovation is concerned with new stuff that adds value to consumers.
Pretty simple definition, that precludes line extensions, which are just a fact of life, and product changes, which are again a fact of life. We are seeking to talk about the things that really make a difference, and how and why that happens.
Following are some thoughts on the nature of the strategic environment we find ourselves competing.
Innovation Paradox. Big businesses get big by being able to reproduce things without variation, their processes ensure consistency, and reject the outliers. This goes as much for people as it does products, so generally large businesses have more difficulty seeing and acting on something new than small ones. There are obvious exceptions, and large businesses everywhere are seeking ways to overcome the innovative inconvenience of their scale, with greatly differing levels of success. Nevertheless, the generality holds, but the small business end of the FMCG supply chain has been decimated, perhaps almost eradicated by the scale of the supermarkets and the power of their business model. Where is the innovation going to come from I wonder.
Risk. The risk profile of every business is different, but as a generality small businesses have a greater capacity to take risky decisions, but a less capacity to absorb them when they go pear-shaped. Large businesses survive on consistency as noted, and success for individuals in a large business is usually counted by their successes, failures are frowned upon, so the tendency to take risks is reduced, hence, their inability to innovate. Again there are notable exceptions, but they always occur when there is a leader who mandates and lives risk tolerance.
Wide view. Any organisation, no matter how big, only has a small proportion of the people thinking about the categories they compete in, so why do you think you will come up with the great ideas? Those using what I have always called “Environmental Research” always do better. This has nothing to do with hugging trees, and everything to do with understanding the context in which the behaviour of your consumers happens. When you understand the context, and see shifts, the opportunities suddenly become more easily identified.
Habit. Consumers are driven by their own habits, and once formed, it takes a lot of effort to break them. Habits work because they make our lives easier, and we are loathe to risk what we know works, for that for which there may be a question.
Boundaries. Innovation efforts need boundaries, or they tend to wander off into irrelevancy. I have found it far better to provide those boundaries in the pre-workshop, if that is what you are doing, material. It is necessary to encourage people to as the cliché goes, “think outside the box” but it is counter productive to have people thinking outside the municipality. Far better to ground the process in a context that is familiar, where there is market and customer knowledge available to feed the process. Without such grounding you tend to get uncertainty and irrelevancy, and ideas and conversation that skates across the surface rather than digging deep to where the problems and opportunities that provide the fodder of successful innovation are buried. I love the metaphor of Classical music and Jazz in the context of innovation, the score provides the boundaries. To be a good classical music player, you need to be a master of your instrument, and be able to reproduce note perfectly what the composer has written, the allowable variation is very small, the emphasis is on technique. Jazz by contrast requires that you are a master of the instrument, as well as the music to the extent that you can take what a composer has written and innovate around the base rhythm and melody, so you need to be not just a master technician, but a master of the music. Great innovation in a commercial environment has exactly the same characteristics.
Think different. The great 1997 Apple advertisement said it all, but how many corporate entities will tolerate the crazy ones? Very few. If you are to truly be an innovator, somehow you have to accommodate some crazy ones. Generally they are tough going, irreverent, unconcerned with status and the status quo, constantly irritating the nice smooth flow of processes that deliver the consistency that corporates thrive on.
Problem definition. Innovation occurs when a problem is solved. Often it is an old problem solved in a new way, sometimes it is a problem unrecognised until the solution comes along, the classic example being the post-it-note. A huge part of the challenge of innovation is the identification of the problem. Rarely does a problem emerge with a fully-fledged solution, but as Einstein, in my view one of the greatest marketing thinkers who never receives any credit at all once said, “if I had an hour to solve a live changing problem, I would spend the first 55 minutes defining the problem, the rest is just maths.”
Margin maintenance. This is tangled up with risk profile, but is separate. Over the years I have done many proposals for new products killed at the gate by the margin problem. “If we launch this, it will erode our margins” often true, but the standard response I give is “better us than someone else”, but it is often a futile response when the ultimate decision maker is compensated by short term considerations. After all, Kodak managed to survive for 40 years after they invented the digital camera in1975, several generations of CEO had passed through in that time, all taking their packet, it was just the last in the line who had a problem.
Value not just price. Consumers look for “value”, but way too often that is translated by suppliers and the retailer into “price”. Price is just one way of reflecting value, but it is the most obvious, and easiest to articulate.
Barriers. Every industry has its own set of barriers to innovation in addition to the more general ones above. In the case of the Australian packaged goods industry, they are several, all associated with the concentration of power in the retail trade.
Margin squeeze
Speed of house brand copying the successful products
Timing of distribution and advertising
On shelf management of facings, cut in, position, promotional programs and stock weight
13 week “live or die” time
On shelf upfront costs
Category management if you are not the category captain, and few small businesses are, you are at a significant disadvantage
Risk averse retailers
Habit. Everyone is used to doing business in a certain way, so that is the way it is done.
Opportunities for suppliers.
Similarly to barriers, every industry has its own unique set of opportunities that when seen are open for businesses to chase.
Social media. FMCG suppliers have not yet solved the problems of how to best use social media to market their process in supermarkets.
Mobility. Engagement with the web and its tools is now mobile, a majority of net interactions are mobile, and most people have their smart phones with them all the time. Using this capability and the geo-location capability to foster a direct relationship between the brand owner and the consumer with the supermarket playing the distributor role is a real opportunity currently under-recognised and utilised.
Food service and ingredient. These are fragmented markets, where innovation, service and brand can still play a real role, and getting a return on your investment is still up to the quality of your business, not the whim of a buyer in a gorilla suit. Depending on whose numbers you use, sales outside the major chains of ingredient and to food service outlets from fine dining to fast food, is north of 60 $billion.
Digital coupons. Retailers in Australia have ensured that the redeemable coupon, so prevalent in the US does not get a start here, too much transaction cost, but a digital coupon? Why not? There have been several tries of various types, Groupon being the most obvious, but smartphones make it so much easier to collect coupons and redeem them in some way, not necessarily even associated with the retailer.
Range optimisation. Category management as it has evolved has always been data intensive, and from a retailers perspective, the objective has been margin optimisation. The next step I suspect will be range optimisation which is really just margin optimisation with a far greater understanding of consumer behaviour thrown into the mix. We have all operated with the view that our various research tools and their data gave us enough to work with, and they did, but suddenly there is the “big data” behaviour mining opportunity offered by social media and geo location, in addition to the fragmentation of times we shop, and how we place and receive orders. Range optimisation to accommodate all these changes just became in my humble view, the FMCG marketing challenge of the decade.
Innovation from the waste. Until very recently, produce that was outside the specs for appearance was consigned to the waste bin, juicing, and other marginal uses, it was not deemed good enough by retailers to sell, not because it was nutritionally or organolepticly deficient, but because it looked crook. Along came the idea of highlighting the products visual imperfections, “Imperfect pick” is the term Harris Farm have used, Canadian chain Loblaws has successfully rolled out “ugly fruit” in Canada, and both Woolies and Coles appear to be tinkering with the idea currently. There are a myriad of opportunities to utilise undervalued product to build a category, for example, shin bones are the foundation of Osso Bucco, many of us will sample great Osso Bucco at an Italian restaurant, but never cook it at home, when it is an easy, tasty meal with a very low meat cost. Pretty simple marketing I would have thought.
Innovation is tough, but it is also fun and makes the future. Those who just wait for the future to happen will be overwhelmed by it, those who take a role in shaping it will at least have the chance to do well.
This post is the 8th in the series examining the means by which small businesses can deal with the retail gorillas.
The one that started it, back in October 2014, is a summary of the 10 ways to beat the gorillas at their own game, a summary post that generated a lot of interest, so I expanded the individual points in subsequent posts.
The first expanded post was the 3 essential pieces of the business model
The second, 5 ways to compete with data
Third, 6 category management ideas for small business at Christmas
Fourth, 9 imperatives for small businesses to build a brand
Fifth deals with the reality for all supermarket suppliers, that they have two customer types, requiring different approaches.
Sixth, deals with the least understood large cost impact on small businesses: Transaction costs.
Seventh suggested ways for small businesses to collaborate for scale,
Oct 6, 2015 | Branding, Marketing, Small business, Social Media
VW advertising has helped redefine the practise of marketing and advertising over 60 years, and in the process built a brand valued in their last balance sheet at $US23 billion
How much of that 23 Billion has been trashed by the unfolding fraud?
The value of a brand is made up of thousands of individual things over a long period, all adding to a disposition or feeling in consumers minds.
In VW’s case, it really started with advertising in the early 50’s, the original “Lemon” ads that changed the way we thought about advertising, to the more recent “Star Wars” ad series.
I wonder about the impact of the recent publicity on the new car buyer.
Will they now be more likely to add another brand choice to the list of possibles as they consider and research their new car purchase? Will current owners be more or less likely to believe the message on the dash that tells them a service is now due?,
Every business from MNC’s like VW to the bakery around the corner has to be aware of the value of their brand, and the added vulnerability it now faces with the advent of social media, and its ability to generate commentary. United airlines found this to their detriment when they broke a songwriters guitar. This particular piece of payback has been viewed over 15 million times, spawned a host of parodies, song series, covers and even books, and it is a wonderful case study on corporate response to customer service for people like me.
Marketing people are now pretty quick to extol the virtue of social media as a tool to build brands, and some (the few who read balance sheets) even recognise the goodwill you can reflect in the accounts, but are they as vigilant on the flip side?
Rarely.
Investment in brands should be considered as a long term investment, something that will keep on delivering if you get the basics right and nurture it. For small businesses, they have the opportunity to appear to be much larger and sophisticated than perhaps they are if they think about the basics of brand building,.
Unlike physical assets, brands appreciate with use, care and attention, but the flip side is there as well, as VW has discovered.
I will watch their next set of accounts with interest.
Sep 28, 2015 | Branding, Customers, Marketing, Social Media
courtesy: Hugh McLeod Gaping void
Social media presents enormous opportunities for small businesses to connect with their customers in ways not imaginable just a few years ago.
However, like every new tool that comes along, it can be misused and certainly abused, and is certain to be touted by carpetbaggers. Considering the following list may save you some heartache.
- It will not address failings in your band positioning and execution. Get those right, and Social media can be a great addition, but it will not backfill the failures of creative, customer and problem focused strategic thinking.
- It will not make your brand interesting to potential customers who are not interested in what you have to offer.
- It cannot help you when all you talk about is yourself. People are more interested in themselves than in you, and unless you grapple with and answer the “What’s in it for me” question, you will end up talking to yourself.
- It cannot guarantee to go viral. Very few things go viral, it is like winning the lottery, the more tickets, the greater the chance, but each ticket has the same chance as all the others.
- It will not make up for poor content. In fact, poor content can kill any potential success your strategy may have, stone dead.
- It does not operate in an objectiveless world, so cannot deliver on objectives you have failed to articulate and plan for.
- It will not compensate for poor customer service. In fact, one of the great things is that those with poor customer service will be exposed quicker than ever, and go broke, reducing the ‘noise’ in the market.
- It rarely seems to ignore the things you may rather have it ignore, like lousy customer service.
- It will not change the world, although there is evidence that it can make a major contribution in that direction.
- It is not free. Posting of social platforms may be free, but there is considerable effort and many challenges before you will have any chance of being noticed. That effort will incur at least opportunity cost if you do it yourself, or professional costs if you outsource.
- It does not just happen. Being good at leveraging the opportunities of Social media is like anything else, you can only get out after you have put in. Success always takes take considerable effort.
The message is that social media is not the panacea for anything, not a silver bullet for any problem, it is just a tool in the marketing toolbox. It might be new and shiny, and seemingly changing daily, and being touted as the next big thing, which to some extent it is, but it remains just a means to an end, not the end itself.
Sep 23, 2015 | Branding, Marketing, Small business
“Free” is a really powerful word, it gets used often to gain attention, and put urgency into a call to action, particularly if the “free” period is short.
How many of us have not reacted at some time to the siren song of “Free?”
However, “free” has a huge downside.
Everyone has heard the old saying, “you get what you pay
for” and it holds true.
Free also means no risk, and no commitment.
Take it, but if you do not use it, there are no consequences.
As a young bloke I worked for what is now Meadow Lea Foods in the time we were building Meadow Lea into one of the great Australian brands. A lot of time was spent in stores, demonstrating the product, giving supermarket shoppers a taste of Meadow Lea on a square of bread.
Pretty boring, but it worked.
When we actually got somebody to try a free sample, that was not the end, we sought to convert that trial to a sale by actively selling the product, which meant the consumer had to make a choice, sometimes change the choice they had already made about margarine brand, a commitment, and that commitment cost them a bit of money.
Meadow Lea ended up market leader by a country mile, 4 times the market share of the number 2 brand in a crowded and competitive market. It was more than great advertising that delivered that outcome.
Some advice. Superficial engagement such as downloading a free e-book is better than nothing, and it does get you an email address, but it falls a long way short of any real engagement and importantly, commitment.
Sep 21, 2015 | Branding, Marketing, Small business
Share of wallet
The calculation is easy, sales over total wallet, the problem is in defining the denominator, or what is in/out of your wallet.
The definition of the wallet is the really hard bit, the debate however, can be extraordinarily useful in terms of focussing the attention of the enterprise on the immediate and longer term priorities, and how those priorities are to be addressed.
Markets can be broken up in as many ways as imagination allows, but often for me it has been useful to break it into three.
Target market. The immediate markets where you need success in order to pay the bills.
Adjacent markets. Those market segments around you that would benefit from your solution, in the event that you were able to create and deliver that solution.
Generic market. The wider market that many consider as ‘The market’.
Lets take the insurance market as an example, as there are plenty of current examples around.
The generic market is, pretty obviously, ‘Insurance’.
Insurance companies are seeking to deliver services in increasingly specific niches, and are often creating apparently separate businesses to do so, although they are really just brands.
NRMA for example started with car insurance, and under that brand also deliver, home, contents, and other types, obviously leveraging their marketing reach to homeowners. Under different brands, CGU, SGIC, and others they also deliver competitive personal products as well as more specialised ones. Similarly, Suncorp delivers a range of products under a host of brands, AAMI, APIA, Bingle, Shannon’s, GIO, and others, many of them overlapping and directly competitive.
If you happen to be the marketing manager of “Shannon’s” car insurance for car buffs, does your wallet include the adjacent market of home insurance for said car buffs?
The arguments for and against are obvious, the temptation to lose focus on the primary target market equally obvious.
For many small businesses there is also a geographic component.
One of my mates runs a café in Burwood, and having this debate with him is instructive.
How does he define his wallet between coffee consumers in Burwood and the adjacent suburb of Croydon, and between individual consumers in those suburbs Vs businesses to whom he offers simple “sandwich catering” to order. The manner in which he spends his limited marketing budget, the sort of offers he makes, and the staffing he employees are defined by the answers to the questions.
Defining your wallet is a fundamentally important process, give it due care and attention.
