The good and bad of AI impact on SME’s

The good and bad of AI impact on SME’s

 

 

 

Anyone who reads my stuff on any sort of regular basis will know I have been deeply engaged with the potential impact of AI on all of us, since I stumbled across ChatGPT in early December last year. Of particular interest is the apparent potential for efficiency gains, particularly amongst the SME manufacturers I serve.

On one hand, I have been excited by the potential of AI to generate efficiency and expand the operational scale of SME’s. On the other, scared shitless at the potential for bad actors to sneak into our collective pockets and steal everything.

I need to write to think.

It forces me to sort out the stuff swimming around between my ears, as when I can articulate it sufficiently to write about it in some coherent manner, it leads to some level of understanding.

So, here is my list of the good stuff, followed by the bad, as it relates to the core of my business: strategy and marketing, starting with SME’s and the written word.

The good things AI can do for you.

  • Summarising large blocks of copy, even when it seems very messy.
  • Brainstorming; ideas, subject lines, complementary ideas, headlines.
  • Editing and grammar. (I have been using the editing and ‘speak’ functionality of word for years, it is essential to me, and is AI that we now just treat as part of the furniture)
  • Assembling descriptions and fact sheets
  • Looking for logical holes in an argument
  • Repurposing copy from one platform to another
  • Research
  • Outline and first draft.
  • Translation and transcription

The stuff AI is no good at doing.

  • Humour
  • Reflecting current news and events
  • Factual reliability. (Sometimes, it just makes stuff up)
  • Finding a good metaphor
  • Being creative. The great irony with creativity is that AI opens a whole new set of what is possible with visual tools, which can then combine with verbal cloning tools to completely alter apparent reality.
  • Looking ahead
  • Breaking complexity down to ‘first principles’
  • Pouring another glass when faced by a blank page and a deadline.

Then there is all the other stuff AI will do, and evolve to do in the very near future, that is not writing. Graphic design, integrating currently separate digital systems (API’s on powerful steroids) identifying trends and holes in huge masses of data. The impact on medical technology is already profound. When the human genome was first successfully mapped in 2000, the cost of that first success was in the tens of billions of dollars. Now you can send away a sample and have it returned with your genome map for a few dollars overnight.

The key it seems, is to be very good at explaining to the tool what it is you want, in the detail a 5-year-old will understand. As the header cartoon illustrates, being human while driving this stuff will rapidly become the differentiator.

Header credit: GapingVoid.com.

 

 

The great marketing opportunity delivered by tough times.

The great marketing opportunity delivered by tough times.

 

A hundred years of practical experience and academic research proves that cutting marketing budgets during tough times is the worst thing you can do. Most do it, simply because it is easy, seems sensible to the uninitiated, and often prevents yelling from the corner office.

This provides great opportunity for those who hold their nerve.

Brands are built by having a ‘share of voice‘ greater than their market share over time. Brand building is a long-term exercise, which becomes cheaper in a recession, as others cut their expenditure, demand for advertising space drops, so does the price as a result, and your customer is more likely to see your ads in a less cluttered environment.

This is a strategic investment.

You should reduce the existing tactical, promotional deals if you can, as they are costs to the bottom line, not investments in your brand. You might get a short-term volume bump, but the added volume rarely replaces the margin lost from the discount.

Do the maths before you agree to the discount.

How much extra volume do you need from the promotion to recover the margin surrendered? Consider also the customers perception of the ‘right price’ for your product. Have you just lowered it?

You can cut yourself to oblivion, easily, while being clapped from the sidelines. Usually those clapping control access to consumers, as do supermarkets, or are those customers who would have been happy to pay more.

Do not miss the opportunity to build your brand while your competitors are hunkered down giving discounts in an effort to maintain volume, while destroying long term commercial sustainability.

 

Header credit Tom Fishburne at marketoonist, who very effectively pokes fun at marketing hubris.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The simple choice marketers must make.

The simple choice marketers must make.

 

When building a marketing plan, one of the key choices that must be made early is a deceptively simple one that most fail to recognise.

  • Are you setting out to serve existing demand?
  • Are you setting out to generate new demand?

Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, when I look at a marketing program, I have no idea which the marketer has chosen. Usually this is because they have jumped the early and challenging question of translating the strategic objectives back into the planning of marketing activities. Marketing is simply the means by which the strategic objective is translated into a series of actions which are communicated to those who might be interested in paying you to consume your product.

There is of course a third option: attempt to do both. However, to do both effectively requires a specific strategic choice. Allowing the ‘do both’ option to become the default of not deciding where the priority lies is commercial cowardice. It leads in most cases to sub-optimal allocation of the limited available resources.

Header cartoon credit: Dilbert demonstrates that choices must be made for clarity.

 

 

 

 

 

The SME marketers 3 card marketing budget optimisation trick

The SME marketers 3 card marketing budget optimisation trick

 

No business I have ever seen has enough in their marketing budgets to do all they would like to do. Therefore, they often start cutting bits off ‘willy nilly’ to reach a budget that can be managed.

There is a better way: Basic marketing 101, which most SME’s ignore to their detriment.

What problem do you solve.

The more specific the problem you solve better than anyone else, and the more specific you can be about those who are likely to have that problem, the more able you will be to focus your limited resources productively.

It appears easy at first glance to articulate the problem, often it is way harder than it seems. The key is to articulate it the way a customer would, rather than the way you speak about it internally. That way you have a chance to avoid the drill or the hole confusion.

Your brand.

Those who have the problem and may be inclined to pay someone to solve it for them, need to be aware of your brand, and the offer you make that will solve the problem for them. You must figure out the best way to reach these people in such a way that you may be able to at least add your brand to the list of options they have for consideration. Preferably of course, your brand is the only one they consider.

Trust.

There must be a reason for someone to pick your solution in preference to others that may be available. If that reason is price, then in most cases you have already lost by winning that race to the bottom.

Trust is hard won, and easily lost, but plays a crucial role in any sales process.

For most SME’s doing more than one thing at a time is challenging, so they tend to throw money at all three without adequate consideration of the best options they have to leverage their small budgets. There are many service providers out there who have all sorts of creative and verbally attractive ways to spend your money, but very few will go to the trouble of walking through this minefield with you.

It is easy to be overwhelmed, most are.

However, thinking about the process in these three buckets offers the opportunity to weed out a lot of the ‘noise’, although it is not easy.

The line that trips many up, even those who spend the time to deeply consider these three buckets, is the breakup of the budget between the two very different types of expenditure inherent in the whole process.

First. The resources you spend to build the brand, such that when someone is aware of the problem and is in a mind to consider solving it, your name comes to mind.

Second. ‘Activation’. The tactical means you use to swing the choice your way at the point of the transaction.

The first is long term, and very hard to measure except with hindsight, by which time the horse has bolted. The second is more immediate and subject to at least a modicum of quantitative measures.

The starting point should always be your objective.

Is it to generate leads, is it to build brand awareness, is it to build trust, and where do all these, and other points in the customers decision processes overlap?

Playing cards by yourself is usually a way to win, but it does not translate into a real game. For that you need a real appreciation of the barriers to winning, and often partners.

Call me when you need a partner who inderstands the game.

 

 

How to grab attention in an AI world

How to grab attention in an AI world

 

 

On first glance, the only purpose of a blog post, or indeed any sort of content that comes into your inbox, is to provide some impetus to encourage you towards a transaction.

That remains the case, but if that is the only reason, we have arrived at the point where AI can spit out posts by the dozen that purport to serve that purpose.

Not a good place to spend your time if you are on the receiving end, and it serves to degrade the expected standard of all posts.

By contrast, a post that evolves from an idea, problem, or situation faced by a real business, which is intended to offer some level of insight into the way forward can be of immense value, when the right people find it.

Therein lies the attention challenge of those writing posts intended for the latter reason. How do you get the attention the effort reasonably deserves?

If, like me, you do not care much for the attention, or the lead generation potential of posts, you can then produce them with an entirely different objective.

That objective is to clarify your own thinking sufficiently to be able to articulate it to others. That clarification and articulation is what makes the research, thinking and writing of a post valuable. Whether others see it, think about it, and take some sort of action as a result, is an entirely different challenge.

Posts on StrategyAudit are all of the latter type.

Ideas come from anywhere, and have been the fodder for posts on StrategyAudit for 15 years. There are ideas everywhere. The most useful are those that come from the challenges being faced by those I interact with in some way. These always force creative thinking, the application of one of many ‘mental models’ I have accumulated over 50 years. They often stimulate a creative perspective on what are often mundane and common problems faced in varying ways by all businesses, so are ‘grounded’ by those real situations.

It seems to come back to the thought expressed by Kevin Kelly in an essay in 2008 thinking of the same challenge, as yet not powered by AI, that all you need is 1000 true fans.

Social platforms set out to prevent you doing that by favouring ‘on platform’ communication, while penalising posts that take a reader away. LinkedIn is very explicit about this. Put in a link to an outside site, and you get stuck in ‘LinkedIn Gaol’, just an algorithmic means of severely limiting the number of feeds your posts are fed to. I have been in LinkedIn gaol for years, the only way to see all I write about is to subscribe on the website.

The only way to grab attention is to deserve it, and have those few who find you to refer to others who might benefit. It is a long game, built one by one.

No AI here, guaranteed organic!!

 

 

 

The rule of the niche

The rule of the niche

 

 

Standard marketing advice in this day of homogeneity, and certainly my advice for SME’s, is to ‘find a niche and own it’.

Be the only one that competes in a market niche that you define.

The deeper, darker and more remote the niche the better, because when you get engagement there, you will be alone, you alone will be able to address the needs of those few who inhabit the niche with you.

Kevin Kelly’s now famous quip from his 2008 essay:  ‘to be successful you do  not need millions of followers, you need only a thousand true fans’ remains as accurate today as it was then.

A true fan is one who will buy anything you produce, they will drive 200kms to see you in a bookstore signing, then buy a bunch of signed books to give away to friends.

The challenge of course is to find those true fans, or more accurately, create the circumstances where they find you, and move through the now standard journey of Awareness, Knowledge, Liking, Preference, Conviction, and Purchase, to Advocacy.

Marketing plays a role in each step of the journey, but the starting point must be ‘macro’. If you start at the niche end of the cycle, too few will be able to find you. There needs to be a filtering process from the macro to the micro for there to be sufficient opportunity for those in the niche who may become true fans to find you in the first place.

It also pays to consider the paradox: There may be a niche in the market, but is there a market in the niche? For you as an SME, the niche may be ideal, but too small for a larger competitor to bother with, or even see.

,Niches can be global, local, and everything in between. To some they represent a ‘Blue Ocean’, a market without competitors. The question now is whether there is a market in the niche, wherever it hides, that will generate an ROI on the resources you allocate towards owning it.