Awareness needs to be earned

Social network marketing is a fundamentally different beast to “traditional “marketing. When talking to marketers, they usually see social media as being in effect free, the challenge is to get the message spread, often by being outrageous, generating awareness for little money compared to traditional media.

To my mind, it is much more complicated than that.  “Word of Mouse” on social media has to be earned, and that is really challenging, requiring intimate knowledge of the marketplace, customers, their behaviour, and what is likely to positively engage them. Traditional marketing makes it easy to gain a general level of awareness, you just have to pay for it, but like most things that are easy, the return is very low.  

The last 10 yards.

Independent produce retailers appear to be resurgent, based on the quality of their offer to consumers.

For years anybody who has been involved with FMCG has known about the challenge of the “last 10 yards“, the distance between a supermarkets back dock and the selling face. Retailers talk about out of stocks, and lost sales, suppliers struggle with short lead times, demanding delivery schedules and the lack of accurate and collaborative forecasting.

Added to these are these challenges presented by fresh food, perishability, appearance, consumers determination to handle and “cherry-pick” the produce, and the nightly put-away. The major supermarkets would appear to be losing share to resurgent independents, as they have responded to the supply chain challenges with greener fruit, more resistant to damage, and offering a longer period to maximise the opportunities for sale. Downside is that green fruit is not much good to eat.

Produce is a difficult category where training and product knowledge is more important than in any dry grocery category by a mile. Why then are there casuals in produce? Last week I saw, not for the first time, a seventeen year old tipping a box of tomatoes onto a display like they were Lego bricks, surely some training would be useful? In this case, it was the last 10 inches that stuffed the tomato. 

No wonder specialists who know their business, and can manage the challenges particular to a category are doing a better job than generalists, and consumers are responding.

 

Paradox of choice.

So much choice in everything we do, isn’t that great?

Maybe not.

There is so much choice in most things that now we are running the risk of paralysis, procrastination, and often, we just walk away.

Barry Schwartz, a psychologist and terrific communicator puts the hypothesis that in western societies, less choice would make us happier, a view somewhat at odds with the conventional wisdom that greater choice is one of the great benefits of economic and social development.

Consider what is happening in supermarkets. Retailers are setting out to drive category growth, suppliers are fighting each other for a share of the existing, and the growth, usually by line extensions, and each wonder why all the activity leads to the same sized cake being cut up a bit differently but at great cost to all parties.

Perhaps the array of choice is causing the potential growth to turn around and walk out the door, confused and uncertain?

Fact and hyperbole.

It is often pretty easy recognise marketing hyperbole when we see it, particularly in a category where we have some knowledge. However, in a category where we have no knowledge, it probably is not as easy to pick the fact from the flummery, so even some of the more extravagant claims made may get through the mental fence.

Therefore, hyperbolic claims extolling the virtues of a new small car for example,  are more likely to be rejected by the men who may engage with the ad, because they largely believe they know a bit about cars, rather than  women, who believe they know little about cars, and are therefore less able to pick the BS from the facts. 

This becomes very relevant when marketing a product to a category of consumers who know a bit about the product, and are therefore going to be more critical of the message based on what they know, or believe they know about the category, so be careful of the hyperbole, it will almost always turn off potential buyers, rarely persuade them.

 

Challenge of the first.

    In this digital age, the first contact in most situations is digital, where the marginal cost is approaching zero.

    This simple fact has changed the sales cycle, as this contact can evolve into an offer to become closer, or it can become a barrier, but each party understands implicitly that the rules have changed.

    The question now is not one of how quickly can a sale be closed, or indeed, the process brought to an end, there is more dancing involved, largely because the dancing is cheap, non threatening, and easy. For a sales organisation, there are a few simple  questions:

  1. What sort of digital tools do we need to engage key prospect groups?
  2. How much time and effort should be spent on developing a sale before we reach the go/no go point?
  3. How much do we need to give away?
  4. “Give away” now more often than ever strays into the arena of proprietary IP, as  efforts to differentiate and add value in a commoditised world accelerates

Has the web has changed category behavior?

Running a qualitative consumer research group recently, one of the participants surprised me with a metaphor that made great sense.

She said that the web had taught her to “forage”, her  term, looking for stuff of interest, checking out the Sku’s available in a category  far more widely than previously, when she had a modest “basket”  of regulars, with a pecking order, and that did not change much from month to month.  This reminded her of the behavior of the farm dogs she had as a kid, always looking for something to eat, in different places, and always nuzzling something new when it became available, and then deciding if it had any interest.

The implications are pretty clear. Experimentation within categories, and into adjacent categories may have been encouraged by the transfer of the  “nuzzling” behavior we undertake every day as we cruise the web, looking for tit-bits of interest.

Sku numbers  in supermarkets have exploded over the last 20 years, and I always thought it was just the drive for shelf presence and often minor differentiation in an effort to attract consumers that had driven it, but perhaps there is something more primal in our reaction to variety.