Piracy or obscurity?

Application of public technology in the past has been often seen as a means by which the state can exercise control, and as such has come under severe criticism from civil libertarians. Remember the howl that emerged with the “Australia Card” debate in the eighties.

However, any reasonable view of the currently available technology would see that it has enormously added to the power of the individual to control their circumstances.

Anyone now can become a published author or photographer, a band need not contract to a record company to get its music heard, and the individual has access to vast amounts of information of all types.

The fact that some do not manage this new power has nothing to do with the technology, just about how people use it. Tim O’Reilly argues convincingly that an artists greatest problem now is not piracy, but obscurity, little has really changed, it is just the means to the end that has changed.

 

 

Market share, another question of Quantity Vs Quality

Market share is probably the most commonly used non financial measure, almost everyone uses it who can access even basic market and competitive data.

The rub comes when you consider who is in the share.

A simple share number can disguise high customer churn, high costs to service, and significant investment in customer acquisition to counter the churn, all of which costs money.

The same share made up by a loyal customer base will deliver much better profitability, so having a way of discriminating between customers with differing levels of profitability should be a crucial underpinning of marketing activity.

Making money in the connected “post copyright” era.

The digital age has made the notion of copyright as an enforceable protection of an income stream outmoded. How then do you make money out of an idea?

In the past, people created stuff to be heard (or read, or seen) and that meant you could make money, because people were prepared to pay for the privilege.

In the present, and presumably, into the future, stuff is being created and everybody who chooses can hear you, for free, so the question becomes how do you make money from something you give away.

The answer is tangled up with what people do with what they hear for free, the value they can add in other ways than just flogging a single copy of a book, or CD.

Science fiction writer, blogger and all round interesting character   Cory Doctorow  has his books  on his site, free to download, just click and there it is, saving in Australia at least $23.99 on a purchase. You can also order a hard copy, signed if you want it, and see the other stuff he has written, and get an opportunity to  be exposed to his views.

As a writer, his objective is to get over a point of view, as well as making a living, and that happens any time someone reads his words.  “Free Books” attracts them to the site, and often they end up buying, something, even if it is only into an idea. Most people prefer to read a book, so often an engaged reader will buy a copy of a book they have read for free, and they refer others to the book, buy it as gifts, and generally act as apostles for the specific  book, and the body of work.

A number of headline bands are following the same strategy, download the music for free, and come to the concert, where they will sell you a seat, merchandise, an experience you will remember, and a place in the “triiibe”, the term coined by Seth Godin and explained in his book which he initially gave away, but has subsequently inhabited the best seller lists as a result of the value of the ideas articulated. That book gets referred to in places like this, and sales sometimes result, sales powered by the initial freebie, and the power of an idea.

The power of the individual.

The new conventional wisdom is to use the net as a marketing tool. I am certainly one who believes that the net is as influential as was the introduction of TV as a marketing medium, but the “rules” for brand building remain similar on the net as they have always been, just the emphasis, and degree of control of who receives  the message is different.  The focus  of activity is now onto the individual, rather than a group of people who display some commonality.

The first and biggest challenge is to recruit visitors to your site, and gain their permission to engage with you, and this is getting harder by the day as the number of sites explodes, as does the sophistication of the strategies to attract users.

However, once you have a “user” to leverage the power of the net, you must:

Motivate consumers by using stories, have a narrative which individuals can use to guide their  behavior, and that of their various groups of peers.

Engage with consumers individually, on some level, and facilitate connections amongst individuals who can relate to the narrative.

Leverage the power of the individual communication, by giving people something to do, a way to engage, a reason to buy.

 

 

How do you measure “customer focused”?

customer focus

Customer focused has become a cliché, it appears in a wide range of material, usually it seems, written by people who have never interacted with a customer in their lives.

So how do you measure customer focused? Here are some basic things you need to know before the expression will be more than a cliché:

  1. We know the characteristics of a loyal customer, not just the social economic, but the behavioral  drivers they experience
  2. We understand the relative value of our value proposition to different types of customers.
  3. We measure customer profitability over more than just one, or one periods transactions.
  4. We know why we lose customers, and actively manage the loss of unprofitable customers.
  5. We know how much it costs to attract, and retain profitable customers.
  6. We know where we sit on a customers “value curve” the trade-off customers make between the relative cost and utility of our products, Vs the opposition.
  7. We set out to measure the “advocacy” of our customers for our products.
  8. We collect data from non customers who use opposition products, and we understand them, and the attraction of the oppositions offer Vs ours.
  9. Everyone in the firm recognises that it is not just sales people who have the responsability to serve customers, but everyone in the firm has a role in providing that service, from the CEO to the cleaner, and they all rely on continued customer support for their employment.

When you are well advanced in all of the above, you will be reasonably able to call yourselves “customer focussed”

Wake up Woolworths suppliers

How long will it take for the politicians in this country to forge an acceptable compromise amongst all the interests in the carbon debate, and take meaningful action.? Probably forever, and  we will end up with the proverbial camel after all the compromise, and that will suit nobody.

Enter the game-changer!

Wal-Mart, the biggest retailer in the world by far, turning over more than  $US450 billion, more than most countries, has changed the game. Last week, they announced they would put carbon footprint information on display labels for all products sold in their stores. Suppliers will be required to assemble the information from their supply chains as part of their trading relationship with Wal-Mart

No recommendations, just the information, and consumers can make up their own minds.

The implications are mind-boggling.

 In one decision, by one company, the nature of the debate about climate change has been turned from one seeking a political, emotional and academic compromise to a very simple choice for the Wal-Mart supply chains, do it or face deletion from their largest customer. Multi-national suppliers, Colgate, P&G, Unilever, Mars, and many others, will suddenly have another marketing lever to use in their marketing activities, across the world.  Suddenly, weasel words in media grabs from pollies are even less meaningful than they usually are.

In Australia, Woolworths follow closely the steps taken by Wal-Mart, and what better way to put added pressure on its arch-rival Coles.

Suppliers to Woolies had better get ready!