Technology driven or customer driven

The technical solutions emerging are fantastic, but how often do you see the technology get in the way of genuine interaction with a customer?.

Like any tool, the tech-tools of the 21st century are only as good as their users, and if their users are technology obsessed, as many seem to be, so what? How does that add value to the consumer?

The great opportunity is to use the tools to become customer obsessed, and genuinely deliver value and benefit to customers by intimately engaging with them and their needs.

It takes effort,  and the right culture to support the effort, but “micro-marketing” to consumers, meeting their individual needs via the tech tools will become the driver of success in the future.

Social media is not free, so chase a return!

There may be no charge to post stuff onto social media platforms, but if you are running a business, and people are using  the time and resources you have paid for, by definition, there is a cost, even if it is an opportunity cost.

Many businesses I have seen just react to social media use by employees by banning it, usually with a spectacular lack of success, others just ignore it, accepting the time spent as a hidden cost in their overheads, only a few have seen the hidden value.

Surely it would be better to set out to harness the resources that are going to be consumed anyway in such a way that they deliver some value.

Here is a list of ideas, feel free to add to them:

    • Set up a social media intranet to:
        •  harvest new product and improvement ideas,
        • customer service success stories,
        •  problem/solution discussion threads for company centric problems,
        • a virtual “water cooler” discussion forum on just about anything on employees minds,
    • Encourage consumer/customer contact with individuals in the business
    • Offer product usage tips, recipes ideas, to consumers, allowing them to respond and build a community
    • Report on company activities outside normal trading, and seek stakeholders feedback on how they went
    • Ditto for activities of employees away from work
    • Add personal stories about being an employee, supplier, customer or shareholder, personalise the place.

Add your own to the list, I suspect it could go on for pages.

 

 

 

 

Value of certainty

I’ve seen lots of customer service initiatives that promise “delivery by ……..” and no matter how quick that may be, there is still uncertainty about when it will be delivered, and customers will be anxious.

By contrast, “we will deliver at 3pm on the 25th” is very specific, and so long as you do deliver at the nominated time, every time, even if it is a few days longer than then quickest possible, customers just love the certainty.  

What goes ’round comes ’round

Australian manufacturing has been decimated over the last few decades, and whilst there is no single reason for this impact, the determination of the major retailers to use the opening of global sourcing options to reduce their costs and compete on price has been a major contributor.

In my patch, the food industry, a whole layer of mid sized Australian owned food manufacturers have simply gone broke, or sold out to multinationals consolidating manufacturing internationally, as FMCG retailers increasingly sourced overseas. The very few that are left are fighting a rear guard action, and will probably lose.

Therefore, when I hear retailers bleating about the competition from international retailers selling into Australia using the same tools the retailers have used on former Australian suppliers, I think “good one” The latest bleating culminating in an advertising campaign, and lots of appearances by Gerry Harvey amongst others, does nothing but encourage me to believe that the short sighted retail sourcing policies which are just about landed price, with no acceptance of the long term benefits of having a vibrant and innovative manufacturing sector are coming back to bite them on the arse.

Retailers have been dishing it out for years, thumbing their noses at any form of regulation of retail, ignoring the potential and growth of e-tail, it is illuminating to see how they are reacting to some of their medicine coming back to them, although the sales loss is currently only very small, and the consumers they want slugged with GST for online purchases are also their customers, unlikely to thank them for the GST led cost increase.

Get over it, and figure out how to compete on other than shelf price, meanwhile, a few of us are enjoying the sight of retailers squirming.

SME shock absorbers

    All businesses are conflicted, small ones more obviously than larger ones.

    On one hand, the immediate urgency to do whatever necessary to generate the cash to pay the bills, and on the other, the necessity to build capability, relationships, and definitive market position, all critical elements for commercial  sustainability, but there is rarely enough time to do both as well as you would like.

    There is no easy answer to this dilemma, but in my work with small businesses there are a number of strategies, largely borrowed from large businesses that pay dividends:

  1. Act like a larger organization internally, by doing things such as having a formal monthly management meeting, regular formal performance reviews, an overt strategy generation process that involves employees, and detailed operational planning.
  2. Delegate both responsibility and authority clearly. Often those who start businesses do so because they want to feel in control, and delegation does not come easily
  3. Spend 50% of your time (assuming you are the CEO) outside the businesses with customers, and demand chain partners building relationships.
  4. Small businesses benefit hugely from these disciplines, partly because they are so important for the smooth running of any businesses, and partly because it acts as an “insulation” to the unanticipated. Most in small businesses do not see the need, as they are in daily contact with all in and around the businesses, and therefore, some of  these things are seen as unnecessary bureaucracy, when in reality they are more like shock absorbers. 

Focus on the process.

Focusing attention holistically on a whole  process, end to end, and the productivity of the process will improve, improving the outcome.

When you focus just on the outcome, all you get is the opportunity to improve the efficiency of the existing process, but it will have no sustainable impact on the productivity of the process itself, and inevitably when you just focus on efficiency of one part, over time the whole process  will at the very best, remain at the stable level, because as you make efficiency improvements in one spot, in another, something has gone wrong to reduce the efficiency of that point in the process.

If you want to improve, focus on the whole process, not pieces of it.