Jan 24, 2022 | Leadership, Management, Strategy
As I observe the better performing manufacturing businesses around, I see some components not spoken about in any of the verbiage that comes from the various interest and political groups.
These common themes are:
They are close to customers.
This means they are less price sensitive than competitors and are focussed on building a bigger pie in collaboration with their customers. As a result, they always outperform those trying to grab a bigger part of an existing pie using price as the primary driver.
They have high level trade skills.
They have a higher rate of apprentices and tradesmen in their ranks. In the absence of publicly available vocational training, they find ways to deliver it to employees internally. This determination often extends to their key suppliers, adding glue to the supply relationships and enabling innovation through their supply chains. Skilled tradesmen are valued not only for the skills they have, but as people who have combined trade skills with experience, and are therefore tertiary qualified by an alternative route to a university degree. They are often better able to get stuff done as a result. Their deep respect for trade skills results in less turnover of personnel, delivering a substantial competitive advantage.
They seek tertiary educated employees.
The education does not have to be specific to the businesses, they are seeking people who have demonstrated a capacity to apply themselves, learn, and who are curious about what is going on around them. This looks expensive on the surface, but it gives them an ‘intellectual edge’ in the competitive game.
There is a continuity of leadership, and leadership style.
While the individual leaders might change over time, the style remains consistently participative and flexible. This leadership culture comes with a very clear set of performance expectations for individuals and the operations, which evolve in parallel with the strategic and competitive demands of the market.
Optimised and messy live together.
While there is a very strong focus on optimising operations, there is also a recognition that innovation, which is expensive, risky and messy, is fundamental to future competitiveness. They find ways to live with the ambiguity that comes from focussing on optimisation for the existing major part of the business, and exploration at the ‘sharp end’ where they are building the base for tomorrow’s cash flow.
They have big ambitions.
Their strategic planning sessions are not just extrapolations of the current in a nice location with a few beers for bonding. They deeply question the assumptions that shape the business, and allow many voices to be heard, and they reach for the ‘big’ outcome.
This is all effectively anecdotal, coming from observation rather than published data, so it may be a bit flimsy, but it does pass my ‘pub test’.
Header cartoon Credit: Hugh McLeod at www.gapingvoid.com
Jan 21, 2022 | Change, Leadership, Strategy
Momentum as we all learnt in high School physics is Mass X Velocity.
Decisions made have no mass, but they do seem to have the characteristic of building momentum.
Those businesses in my experience that have an overt bias for action make more decisions, get more done, succeed more often than those less willing to decide and act. They also make more mistakes, as they make choices with less than complete data, but are also willing to recognise mistakes earlier and back out, avoiding the ‘sunk cost’ syndrome.
Opportunity cost is hard, if not impossible to quantify, but it is clear to me that those who have the bias to action, make decisions and act on them, will suffer from opportunity cost less than those that wait for perfect, or just more information, by which time the opportunity had gone.
Dad joke:
Knock knock…..… Who’s there? ..….. Opportunity…………Opportunity who? ………….Silence………..
Opportunity does not knock twice!
There is a balance however.
Moving quickly in itself should not be the objective. The challenge is to quickly understand the balance of risk and reward that enables a decision and subsequent action that is important. It makes sense to spend more time considering a ‘bet the farm’ decision than one that is less likely to be catastrophic should it go pear-shaped. Some decisions can be reversed quickly in the event of new data emerging. The mistake is taken as a learning opportunity and embedded in the ‘wisdom’ of the enterprise, to ensure the same mistake is not repeated.
Amazon Prime has been the mother of all marketing tools, delivering Amazon a competitive advantage that has overwhelmed all comers. However, Prime was not born in its current form. It went through a number of iterations over an extended period as Amazon experimented, learnt and doubled down on what worked, while removing the pieces that did not.
Prime started as a ‘2 day shipping’ promotion in a narrow geography, under a promotional name. It evolved to 2 day shipping in the US as the standard, to expedited shipping for a fee, to free shipping with a Prime subscription membership. Over a decade, Amazon has progressively squeezed the time between order receipt and customer delivery at an astonishing rate, that competitors have failed to match. This progressive compression of their decision making and implementation cycle is a key to their competitive advantage.
This bias for action, transparent accountability and learning does build momentum, and once going, is very hard to stop, and almost impossible to compete with successfully.
Nobody ever claimed the prize from Colonel ’40 second’ John Boyd. He was never beaten in a dogfight simulation because he grabbed the initiative and held it, operating inside what he called the oppositions decision making cycle time.
This is decision making momentum, which he codified as the OODA loop.
To me it is one of the decisive competitive tools of the information age.
Jan 17, 2022 | Strategy
It is the beginning of an uncertain new year, following two chaotic ones. Many will have found that performance has been stunted, not just by the chaos of Covid, but by the lack of a capacity to co-ordinate and align activities across competing needs.
Often strategy is confused for a statement of a high-sounding mission or purpose, or the set of values under which they will operate. Sometimes, the strategy statement is as simple as the EBIT objective the MD set for the coming year.
All are necessary, none are strategy.
Your strategy statement should be your competitive game plan. It sets out in simple words three parameters:
- Your objective. This should never be a platitude, or something that can be applied to any business in your competitive sector. It must be the item against which all actions can be judged over an extended period. These are always best articulated using the SMART framework.
- The scope of activity. Your scope is a guide to which activities will be pursued, and more importantly, which will not. Defining what you will not do, removes much of the uncertainty about how objectives will be achieved.
- Competitive advantage. What is it that you do, or intent to do, that will deliver greater value to customers than they can find with your competitors. This is often the hardest of the three to articulate, and often becomes a statement of what you think you do well, or are setting out to do better. This is of no value in the absence of customers caring. A $50 watch tells the time as well as one that costs $50,000, so having a watch that tells accurate time is not a competitive advantage.
When your strategy statement achieves these three things, articulating the objective, scope, and your competitive advantage, in a short statement, you will have achieved more than most, and are off to a good start.
However, there remains the challenging task of implementation.
No matter how articulate, insightful, engaging and motivating your strategy statement, you will have achieved a score of 1 out of 10 on the strategic scorecard.
The other 9 points are reserved for implementation, the really, really, hard bit, the every- day work of leadership and management.
None of this is easy, is rarely done in a short time, and never without vigorous debate based on data, and the varying analyses of the implications from the data that can be made. It is also an iterative process, that improves with vigorous ‘pressure testing’ and ‘what if’ questions.
The question ‘How does this activity add to the achievement of the strategic objective‘ should always be asked during the course of normal activity. In the absence of a good answer that reflects the objectives of the strategy, the activity should not proceed.
Let me know when I can help you sort out this Gordian knot.
Jan 13, 2022 | Customers, Marketing, Strategy
Google has been a revelation, all the answers you need at your fingertips, or so it would seem.
What is the consequence of this instant question gratification?
Do we ask better questions, or just more superficial ones?
Does the volume of questions we ask, to which there are instant answers, substitute for the value of the fewer but deeper questions we used to ask?
My clients and those in my networks hear me rambling on about what I regard as the key to success. That single characteristic I have seen in all successful people I have known, and watched from a distance. Yes, they are all smart, and yes, they are all motivated to success, but underlaying those two factors is a third characteristic:
Curiosity.
I have never seen someone who is smart, and successful, who is not also curious. I have also seen many who have both of those characteristics, but are not successful. Generally, they strike me as not being also curious.
I use Google and Wikipedia every day to answer questions that emerge as I service clients and write this blog, but neither offers the catalyst to a post. That catalyst is curiosity, sated by the deep but selective ‘backgrounding’ I do of books, podcasts, blogs, journals, and absorbing informed commentary.
They are where the catalysts are hidden, uncovered by curiosity.
Social media, Google and Wikipedia specifically have sated our curiosity at a superficial level. No longer do we have to search for answers to questions, they are dished out for us, making life easy, but reflecting the superficiality of the answers to the superficial questions we ask.
Are our lives better because of this ability to get immediate answers to questions?
Undoubtedly yes, but are the questions as useful, offering the deep insights found as we used to dig around for answers, often finding that the initial question was inadequate, superficial, or simply the wrong question.
I like books, my car is a mobile library from which I can consume from a menu of offers in the idle moments between the busy times out of my home office. The one I pick at any time is most likely the one that relates to a question on my mind at that time, or that throws light on a topic of current interest.
Thanks Google and Wikipedia, you have made my life easier, both because I can find the answers to superficial questions, and because most of my competitors stop there, at the superficial.
You need books to go deep.
Jan 5, 2022 | Analytics, Strategy
Question: What has enabled the geometric growth rates of Facebook, Google, Amazon, Atlassian, and other digital unicorns?
Answer: Wide and deep feedback from the market enabling them to aggressively focus resources on areas that deliver the best returns.
Technology is only the tool that has enabled this unprecedented level of feedback, in real time. It is the feedback itself that has been the driver of growth.
It has always been so.
Finding ways to build an understanding of the drivers of superior performance has been the goal of intelligent marketers, and management more generally, forever. The experts in the pre-digital age were the direct response advertisers, who were able to determine quickly which version of a magazine or TV ad caused the phones to ring and the coupons to be redeemed. Post digital, it is those who are able to collate and analyse the response in just the same way, except it can be done in real time.
They have become the masters of absorbing market and customer feedback, then being able to evolve rapidly and continuously by leveraging that knowledge on an ongoing basis.
Amazon started off as a bookseller, the plan was never to become the master of retail. This evolved with them as they quickly noted what worked, and doubled down on it, continuously. Meanwhile, they were prepared to invest in the adjacencies that emerged, several of which, such as AWS, have become monster businesses.
That process continues, even as Jeff Bezos invests in blue sky projects like satellite internet, drone delivery, electric cars, and space vehicles.
The hardest part is building the initial momentum. Once you have it, that momentum will drive other ‘flywheels’ becoming a virtuous cycle that is almost self-perpetuating.
Header credit: Scribbled ‘Flywheel’ diagram by Jeff Bezos on a restaurant napkin in 2001. It is driven by input metrics, specifically market feedback.
Dec 29, 2021 | Marketing, Small business, Strategy
At the end of the year, it seems sensible to have a look at the posts that generated the most traffic. Surprisingly, none are posts that have gone up in this most challenging year, not an outcome I anticipated. This demonstrates the long-term value of a blog of this nature. Collecting and curating ideas and perspectives over a long period becomes an investment, certainly for me as the writer, and hopefully for those who choose to follow, or just dip in from time to time.
In order, from the most viewed, the 10 were:
5 key factors to consider when planning your budgeting process. January 2020.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-2sN
This post was the first of 2020, and did generate some traction early on. However, in the early parts of 2021, when suddenly businesses had to rethink their budgeting processes in the face of Covid it took off. It will no doubt kick along again in the early part of 2022, which is unlikely to be much more predictable than the year just finishing.
3 essential pieces of the supermarket business model. November 2014.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1pd
First published way back in 2014, this post has been number one or two in the most read posts every year since. Clearly the elements of the supermarket business model retain an abiding interest. Retail is also the core of my corporate experience, now 25 years behind me. Many of the illustrative stories in these pages come from that time, as the lessons are timeless. The tools have changed, the behavioural foundations remain very consistent. Even amongst the massive switch to online retailing in the past year, the foundations of retailing have remained consistent. The pace has increased geometrically, and the logistics are new, but the basic requirement for success, to add value to the consumer, remains exactly as it was.
The 4 dimensions of project planning. August 2017.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Gz
Every business is a mass of individual and group projects of various types and importance. This post offers a framework to consider when going about the planning processes. Planning is another form of predicting the future, and as we know, that is not a reliable process. However, planning ensures you are better prepared than just relying on being reactive as circumstances change. As Eisenhower noted just before the Normandy landings in 1944 ‘In preparing for battle, I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable’
The 5 strategic dimensions of price. October 2018.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-2ba
To my mind, this is one of the more important posts I have written amongst the 2100 over 13 years. How to set and maintain optimum price is a challenging, even confronting task, too often not given the strategic importance it deserves. After all, every added dollar of revenue you can extract from the marketplace falls straight to the bottom line, and it is the one driver of profitability over which management has absolute control. It is one of a number of posts around price that are in the archives.
A marketer’s explanation of Net Present Value. February 2018
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-20v
Net Present Value, or NPV, is an accounting term thrown around with gay abandon by accountants, assuming everyone understands what it means. Over the years, very few marketers I have known had a clear understanding of NPV. Hopefully, this post helped some in those conversations with their accounting peers, trying to get their own back for all the jargon marketers habitually use, by using a bit of their own.
A private note to the chairman. April 2013
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-10x
This one was a surprise. It is an old post from 2013 that paraphrases a conversation I had with the chairman of an organisation on whose board I sat at the time. We had failed to agree for some time over a series of questions that could be characterised as the priority list against which the board should have been making resource allocation decisions for management to execute. At the time I was pretty fired up, and subsequently resigned the role. On rereading the post, I would not resile from any of the items listed, and would offer the same advice were I to be in a similar situation again.
How to wield Occam’s Razor to build robust strategy. June 2016.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Rd
Occam’s Razor seems to have become a bit fashionable recently which is perhaps why this post got a guernsey in the top ten, after languishing with the ‘also-rans’ for 5 years. The advice however is sound, seeking the simplest possible explanation that fits all the facts, no matter how unexpected it may be. In a complex and volatile world, simplicity is one the hardest things to achieve.
Classic Marketing Strategy: Before and After. September 2016.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Il
The title says it all. Marketing is about delivering a value proposition to those who may engage and make a purchase. Showing how the outcome of the purchase delivers a positive outcome has always been, and will always be a powerful way to communicate. I used myself as the example, having just had a couple of ‘headshots’ to replace the one I had been using, which was ‘homemade’. It might be time for an update, although the years and inactivity of Covid have not done me any favours.
Problem solving continuum. June 2010.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-k3
This post was a very early one, proposing the idea that every problem sits somewhere on a continuum that describes the way in which management goes about finding and executing a solution. At one end workarounds are common, to the other end where difficult problems are subjected to continuous improvement processes. There is much more that could be said, and a number of subsequent posts addressed some of these items, but given the interest, this idea will receive greater consideration in 2022.
The 7 mental models for Successful marketing. June 2017.
https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Rw
This 10th inclusion reflects on a very personal experience that highlighted to me the simple fact that while the tools of marketing have changed radically over the last decade, the foundations have not changed at all. It is one of the longer posts in the archives, running to almost 3,000 words, and includes an audio version delivered at a small business seminar tagged on the end.
To those who have followed, commented, or just ‘dipped in’ occasionally, I extend my thanks, and hope that you continue to draw some value from my musings.
Have a great 2022, it can only be better than 2021.
