Sep 1, 2024 | Leadership, Strategy
Today, September 1, 2024, is the 85th anniversary of the German invasion of Poland in 1939.
There are very few people left alive who were old enough at the time to remember that critical date that drove the world into an orgy of destruction, death, and depravity.
Over time we tend to lose the instinctive understanding of the context, circumstances, and drivers of events. This increases the risk that we fail to learn, so we repeat our mistakes. In short, our institutional memory fades, becomes distorted, and is often rewritten.
There is evidence of this all around us.
- After the French conceded defeat and left Vietnam, the US went in, believing they could win.
- The US again, (who deliver us numerous examples), thought their invasion of Afghanistan would work better than the Russian one. Like the Russians and British before them, they failed to have any understanding of the tribal, ethnic and historical context of Afghanistan, so were destined to repeat their mistakes.
- Few saw the 2008 financial crisis coming, despite the intensively researched similarities to the lead-up to the 1929 crash.
- The litany of failure of appeasement as a strategy to harness the aggression of regimes in Europe going back to the Romans. ‘Peace in our time’ sounded good on Chamberlin’s return from Berlin, but was empty hope.
We see it in our personal lives every day.
That bully in the schoolyard is not going to stop being a bully by having the tactic proving to be continually successful.
30 years ago, I left corporate employment, suddenly, after 10 years of accumulating market knowledge, experience, and ‘gut-feel’ insight. I was replaced by a group that had no such knowledge and insight, and who for the next few years made utterly predictable mistakes. This is despite the records left in a great big storage box filled as my former office was cleaned out, and in the heads of my former colleagues, but disregarded.
When we lose institutional memory, we are almost destined to repeat the mistakes of the past. This applies equally to individuals as it does to businesses, families, institutions, and countries.
So, how do we best avoid repeating the mistakes of the past?
Rely on data. This requires intentional and effective documentation and archiving of material. It must articulate the varying views and perspectives and their logical base, the hypotheses generated, tested, reviewed, implemented, and the outcomes of implementation tied back to cause-and-effect chains. In effect deliver yourself a searchable OODA loop for reference.
Leverage technology. The above step used to be a monumental undertaking, but current and emerging technology makes it not just easily doable, but a competitive and strategic necessity.
Knowledge transfer and mentorship. Culturally, there must be a recognition of the value not just of having the information but building on it and sharing widely. This takes a particular skill in leadership that builds a culture of learning and trust.
The successful corporations of the future will avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, which leads to erosion of their values and culture. They will see individual and group productivity and innovation as the two necessary sides of the same coin. They will navigate the tensions created by the order and repeatability of optimisation, with the messy and uncertain terrain of innovation.
They will not be able to succeed in the absence of that critical component, institutional memory.
Today is also Fathers day, a triumph of marketing by the Hallmark card company.
Lest we forget.
Aug 30, 2024 | Collaboration, Marketing, Small business, Strategy
Identifying, building, defending and leveraging competitive advantage has been, and will remain, the foundation of successful marketing.
It is also the essence of strategy: making choices with incomplete information that serve to shape the future to your benefit as it arrives.
The challenge is, the location of competitive advantage has moved, and many, if not most, have failed to pick the move.
Think about it.
Until the early 2020’s, competitive advantage was still all about brand, scale, control of supply chains, access to capital, and the ‘old boys network’. To use Charlie Mungers description, they constituted the ‘Moats’ around successful businesses. Kodak, Xerox, GE, GM, Exxon, IBM, Wal-Mart, P&G, and the banks and insurance companies ran the world on the basis of wide and deep moats built on these 5 factors.
Suddenly, the world moved on.
We watched as a raft of new businesses leveraging the capabilities of the internet took over. Along with the obvious Amazon, Facebook, Alibaba, Google, Uber, Air BnB, eBay, Netflix, Salesforce, and others that are pure internet plays, you had Apple, Microsoft, and more recently Tesla, combining the connectivity of the net with the ‘old school marketing moats’ in whole new ways.
What made the difference?
Each of the newbies benefitted from network effects.
Those that dropped out of sight did not.
Even some of the tech giants of the very early 2000’s, such as Yahoo and Alta Vista have dropped out of sight because they failed to recognise the potential value they had in their hands. They did not leverage the potential network effects.
Those network effects have two differing core types:
- An ecosystem of complementary, and often partially competitive enterprises that support each other’s efforts. This occurs particularly often in R&D, early-stage commercial development and in logistics and supply chain management.
- Double sided markets, such as eBay, Facebook, and Air BnB, where the value of the offering increases with the number of people connected to it.
The answer to the question posed in the header: in your networks!
On a simple scale you see it all the time in retail. The specialist shoe shop in the mall collaborating and cross promoting with the fashion dress shop.
Your networks will build as you create value for others greater than the cost of being a part of the network.
Aug 20, 2024 | Leadership, Strategy
George Patton is reputed to have said ‘A good strategy today is far better than a perfect one tomorrow.’
This is absolutely correct. However, any strategy is only as good as its deployment. This is always best when it is clearly understood, consistently communication, and completely aligned towards the objective.
Business is all about making choices, from the c-suite to the factory floor, everyone is faced with choices. Those in the c-suite may be different to those on the floor, but they are nevertheless choices that together impact on the performance of the business.
‘I will do this, I will not do that’
While seeking rhythm and flow in a business, I also look for ‘strategic nesting’
How will the choices made at one level be understood and acted on at different levels in the business in a consistent manner, such that the outcomes do not create turbulence in the flow of activities that occurs.
The challenge of integrating ‘Flow’ into a smooth set of processes that merge at the points where they intersect is substantial. This is where the notion of ‘nesting’ comes into play.
Processes are ‘nested’ in sets of sub processes that are all ‘in synch’ and contribute to the end outcome.
Often this is called alignment, but just using the term without the further idea of ‘nesting’ misses the point. Alignment is one dimensional, nesting is multidimensional.
Effective processes contain sub processes that act in partnership creating synergy, and when done really well, compounding outcomes. Each part of the ‘nest’ is optimized, internally, and in relation to those external parts on which it depends. This enables the optimization of the whole to be compounded.
Effective processes, from the strategic development and implementation to the cleaning of the coffee machine, rely on the effective nesting of sub processes.
The implementation of strategy is always challenging. You are translating high level choices into sets of cascading targets in functional action plans with appropriate KPI’s and feedback loops for optimisation. There are multiple levels from a strategic plan to the execution of daily activities in the workplace for things to fall out of the nest.
The evolution of a ‘happy nest’ is an iterative process. It requires the input of those involved at all levels, and a leadership capable and prepared to adjust choices under new circumstances.
All the parts are moving at the same time, and they all influence each other. Iteration must be a multi-dimensional challenge, you can iterate up, down, and across functions, on the basis of feedback. The challenge is to get it all done without disturbing the flow of the processes.
Aug 16, 2024 | AI, Governance, Strategy
AI is the newest, shiniest thing we have seen since, well, perhaps ever, at least in the speed with which it has overtaken consciousness.
ChatGPT was released to the ‘wild’ in November 2022. In commercial terms, yesterday.
In that time, it has overtaken discussion, business planning, capability questions, and profoundly changed the face of stock markets.
An amazing outcome for a technology without a business model.
The committed AI infrastructure spending over the next year by the big 5 LLM builders, OpenAI, Amazon, Microsoft, Amazon and Google is over $200 billion. Depending on your sources, this might vary a bit, but may even be on the low side. It does not count the billions being spent by everybody else, largely on setting about leveraging the ‘infrastructure’ delivered by the LLM’s.
Again, depending on your sources, the revenues being generated over the next year by AI suppliers, both of the infrastructure and tools rapidly becoming available is probably $20 billion.
Nowhere in history has there been a tsunami of investment of this size and speed in the absence of a solid business model. There is no clear way forward to generating a return on that investment.
This is the equivalent to a goldrush, except, in a gold rush if you were the lucky one to find those elusive nuggets, you had some idea what they were worth, and an established way of monetising the metal.
Nothing of the sort exists with AI.
I have done plenty of capital proposals in my time, some with forecasts that bordered on the wildly optimistic because I believed a change of some sport would be generated by the object of that Capex. In my wildest dreams, I have never proposed anything like the ratio of capex to current revenue exhibited by this investment.
There is confusion around the term ‘Trillion’. Historically, the US and UK definitions differed, the UK version being 10^18, 1,000 times larger than the US trillion which is to the power of 12, or one million million. I explain this for clarity and comparative purposes.
On current stock market valuations (August 2024) Nvidia, a business few had heard of a year ago, is the most valuable company on earth with a valuation of US3.2Trillion. They trade places regularly with Apple for the No. 1 spot. Currently Apple is number 2, also at a rounded 3.2 trillion, but a few tens of millions behind Nvidia. Microsoft is third with 3.1 trillion, followed by Amazon at 1.9, and Meta at 1.3. The comparison I wanted to highlight is with the GDP of Australia, of US1.7 trillion. Australian GDP is just over half the market valuation of Nvidia and Apple, a sobering thought.
An investment of 200 billion against current revenues of 20 billion is simply the biggest financial gamble in the history, by a logarithmic amount.
The people running these massive businesses are not stupid. They see and are betting their companies (and they are ‘their’ companies, as control is in a very few hands) on massive returns, which means in turn that the fabric of everything we see and do must change, very quickly. The business models will change, and they will not be just everybody subscribing for modest monthly amounts to the latest LLM model. There will have to be whole new industries being ‘invented’ with successful business models in place for there to be a return on the capex being deployed.
The windows of opportunity that will open, and close just as quickly, over the next decade are immense.
No wonder there is a gold rush, it is just the location of the gold still in question.
Aug 12, 2024 | Change, Strategy
2024 is very challenging for SME’s.
It is proving to be a time of an unusually high rate of SME mortality. This is driven by the problems that emerged with the Corona virus, followed by a period of historically low cost of capital, then a burst of inflation now being wrung out by aggressive rises in interest rates, the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, uncertainty of supply chains, and a host of other items.
It makes sense for every business owner to consider the value of their business. While having an exit plan is always a good idea, few are proactive in creating one.
While you may not be considering selling any time soon, (or going broke) it remains a valuable exercise to uncover the drivers of value, and double down on them.
Following is my list of value drivers, in a rough order, which will vary with circumstances and conditions in any specific market.
Cash flow.
Managing cash is the single most important thing every business can do to ensure survival, after looking after your customers. Cash is not subject to accounting rules, conventions, or differential tax treatment, as are the P&L and Balance sheet. You either have it or you do not.
Calculating free cash flow, the cash left over after capital expenditure over time, gives an extremely sensitive view of the health of a business.
Happy and committed customers.
You can make customers happy by giving discounts, but that is not a good measure of value. A committed customer will be prepared to pay at least the going rate for your products, and will not be moved by short term incentives from a competitor. Two of the best measures are Share of wallet and customer churn.
How much of a customer’s spend on a category you could supply, do you supply, and what is the ratio of customer loss and gain that is occurring. Committed customers will also be happy to refer you to others, simply the best form of marketing there is.
Customer & supply chain diversity.
‘Don’t have all your eggs in the one basket’ is a dictum that has proved true time and time again. Businesses that allow one customer to become more than about 25% of their revenue are dicing with trouble. In the event that customer goes broke, changes personnel at the top, gets taken over, or a myriad of other things that can happen in commercial life, you can find yourself out in the cold. This is the structural problem facing Australian suppliers to FMCG.
It is the same in your supply chains, but in reverse. Every business wants to be a dominating force in their supply chains, to be able to exercise some level of control. The pandemic has shown us how fragile our supply chains are, so resilience has become a key KPI for many who were previously reliant on single sourcing and JIT supply.
Differentiated in ways hard to duplicate that customers value.
Charlie Munger often spoke about building ‘Moats’ around his businesses. We all understand that a moat is a structure that repels invaders, in a commercial case, competitors. It is a lovely metaphor, and works irrespective of the scale and type of your business.
You build moats by being able to create customer value that competitors cannot or choose not to match, and if they try, their resources are consumed by the power of the Moat. This sort of protection is rarely a function of just one element, in the metaphor, the height of the moat wall and depth of the water. It is always a combination of many contributing strategic and tactical measures.
‘Tide’ detergent in the US retains 50% market share of the washing products market. Any quick look would indicate it to be a commodity market. Anyone with the right gear can make a detergent that does a good job, so how has P&G retained this share? It is a combination of time, disciplined brand building tactics, consistently very good advertising, continuous innovation, and an ability to ‘shape’ the market by being strategically smarter than everyone else. These have delivered first mover advantage continuously to P&G as the ways Tide delivers value to consumers have evolved.
Defined Process maps subjected to continuous improvement.
Imagine a potential buyer comes into your business with a serious intent to consider purchase. Anything you can do that reduces the level of uncertainty that they will feel about the value of your business to them is worth doing. If a buyer sees that business processes are mapped, consistently applied, and the subject of continuous improvement, it will be immensely reassuring. Such an environment will remove a significant source of uncertainty and risk.
Revenue Predictability
Revenue predictability is gold. Forecast accuracy drives not only sales up, but operational costs down, and revenue generation activity more directly connected to results, and therefore accountability.
Over the last 20 years, the nature of revenue has changed from one driven by sales, to one driven by subscription. Once you have a customer ‘signed up’ to some sort of process that delivers revenue automatically, they are both more likely to spend more, as they have a sunk cost to recover, and less likely to leave.
Amazon Prime is the most effective subscription model ever seen. Currently Amazon prime has 170 million subscribers in the US. For $14.99 monthly or annual subscription of $139, subscribers benefit from a range of ‘free’ services from across the Amazon ecosystem. Numbers vary, but solid research puts prime subscribers buying up to 4 times as much on Amazon as the average non subscribing Amazon buyer, up from around $500/year to over $4,000. Not bad when you can also manage the margins they are buying at, and have already banked $11 billion in advance.
My local coffee shop has a loyalty program, the 11th coffee free, so I tend to buy from them when it is convenient to do so. If the situation were reversed, and I had paid a membership up front in order to get a discount, the incentive to go there would be significantly stronger. Amazon Prime has harnessed this basic psychological driver to generate billions of dollars.
Having a clear set of robust leading indicators of revenues, margins and profit, offers certainty to any buyer of your business, as well as to you. They also offer the explicit platform for improvement.
Focus
To optimise your business, and thus enhance its value, it will pay to focus aggressively on the areas where you have some sort of competitive advantage that can be leveraged. This always come down to trimming product ranges, brands, geographies, technology bases, and market segments aggressively. While the analysis is tough, and the choices even tougher, you will inevitably find that the pareto rule applies, and aggressive application drives profitability. A mantra I use with clients is ‘Pareto the Pareto’, suggesting that this optimisation is a continuous process.
Clean books
Using the business as an ‘ATM’ for the owner is a danger sign for any buyer. When preparing your books for the inevitable Due Diligence examination by a potential purchasers accountant, the less items that are up for deeper examination the better. Ensure you have a ‘normalised‘ P&L available for scrutiny that identifies and explains or excludes all the items that may draw a question. Similarly, many SME’s claim to have some component of cash transaction in their business. Expect those claimed transactions and resultant cash to be completely discounted by a potential buyer as a source of value.
Steady growth history
Any potential purchaser is only looking at what you have done in the past, as an indicator of what might be possible in the future. They are only interested in understanding the future return on an investment they might make in your business. Therefore, a history of growth will be an indicator that all things being equal, there is evidence that the growth that will benefit them will continue. Growth that is relatively smooth is always better than growth experienced in fits and starts in the eyes of a buyer.
This applies equally to all financial and non-financial measures.
A strong management bench
Across functions, you need people willing and able to step up as you expand. A balanced and robust bench with solid succession planning through all levels is a hedge against the uncertainty that accompanies an acquisition, and benefits the value of the business.
An obvious culture.
Every business has some sort of culture, the ‘way we do things around here’. A consistent, explicit, and aligned culture that is aimed at delivering a well understood strategy is like cheese to a mouse: irresistible.
None of these are easy to address. If they were, the mortality rate of SME’s would be less than it is.
Jul 22, 2024 | AI, Strategy
Our brains work on 3 levels.
At the most basic is the ‘reptilian brain.’ This is the ancient wiring that is common with every other animal. It monitors and manages the automatic things that must happen for life. Our instincts, temperature control, heart rate, respiration reproductive drives, everything necessary for the survival of the animal.
The limbic system. This manages our emotional lives, fear, arousal, memories, it is where we store our beliefs. It in effect provides the framework through which we look to make sense of the world.
The Neo cortex, the newest part of our brain that differentiates us from other animals. It is where we make choices, it controls our language, imagination, and self-awareness.
This three-part picture is a metaphor. The parts of the brain do not act independently, but in an entirely integrated manner, each having an impact on the others, and receiving input from the others.
Consider the parts of this complex interconnected and interdependent neuro system that is replaceable by AI. There is not all that many of them, beyond the extrapolation of language and imagery from what is in the past.
Despite the hype, we have a long way to go before artificial sentience will be achieved, if it is possible. (Expert opinion varies from ‘Within the decade’ to ‘Never’).
However, who cares?
The productivity gains from AI are present in some form in every current job, and the numbers of new jobs that will emerge are huge. Nobody had conceived of the job of ‘prompt engineer’ 3 years ago!
These new jobs in combination with the renewal of those currently available, will deliver satisfaction, and a standard of living out kids will thank us for.
Sadly, there is always a flip side. In this case it is the dark downsides we all see emerging from social media, which will also be on steroids, and the social dislocation that will occur to those on the sharp end of the changes in jobs.
How we manage that balance will be the challenge of the 2030’s.
Image by Canva.com
